Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

military being overtly pushy about how to vote? little story

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
freeplessinseattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:47 AM
Original message
military being overtly pushy about how to vote? little story
yesterday one of the people I was canvassing with said she has a friend at Fort Knox military base who was "sat down, her absentee ballot placed in front of her, and pretty much told that she was voting for *, while they watched." they didn't exactly hold a gun to her head (tho thatw ouldn't surprise me) but made clear that's what she should do in order to properly serve her country, etc.. I asked her for more details, did they call everyone in to do this same thing, etc. but the friend didn't know. I have her phoen number so I will call her in a few hours to get more details and see if we can find out if this was common there, and how we can go about elicting the truth from the troops. don't know much difference this would make on this eelection, if any, but the dirty work needs to be exposed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mark11727 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. You mean they were ORDERED to vote for *....!?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freeplessinseattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. that's pretty much what it sounded like, but I need to get more details
I guess she was sat down, her absentee ballot placed on the table in front of her, and was to;ld something along the lines of 'you know * is the wise choice, a good soldier would vote*" not exactly told "Vote * or else" but definitely intimidation and abuse of authority. this was in WA so wouldn't make a diff in the vote, but if it happened here why not elsewhere?? I mean, it's implicit that the military traditionally support rethugs, but to overtly campaign, more than campaign, strongly encourage at the moment the ballot is filled out, maybe with some implicit threat and implication of disloyalty. what happened to anonymous voting??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. This has happened for a long time...
... in the military. I got a similar lecture (although it was more carefully worded) in the 1968 election. One could clearly infer from the little speech I got was that Nixon, though not named, was the preferred choice, because he would support the military in a way that Hubert Humphrey would not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC