If voter turnout was only slightly larger than 2000

[Zuni]

why were people waiting in lines for ours in cities in the rain?

[NovaCat]

1. I agree

The popular vote should be in the 125-130 mil range when all is said and done, but I doubt it will be.

[City Lights]

2. This election doesn't pass the smell test.

No matter what happens, bush will never be legitimate in my eyes.

[grace0418]

3. This monarchy brought to you by

Diebold.

[autorank]

4. This election fails the old accounting "reasonableness test."

Something is screwed up. I can't believe that there isn't someone in Diebold who wants to cop plea, get a ton of pub, and the biggest book deal ever: "How I swiped the election"

[DemBones DemBones]

5. Are the media now claiming turnout was only slightly more than 2000?

???

[donheld]

6. i know i'm being pessimestic right now.

The fix is in, but by the looks of things, the votes they wanted to count were in months ago. The played us for four years. They told us what states were red, what states were blue, gave us a few states we could hope for, but they really they (the media the corporate rulers) they are the only ones who got to vote.

[in_cog_ni_to]

7. MILLIONS have been voting for DAYS! There's NO WAY

with the GOTV movement, the motivated Democrats, the Rock the Vore Tour, Fahrenheit 911, the Slacker Tour and all Michael Moore has done, turnout was only "slightly" higher. How stupid do they think we are? People waited in line for 15 HOURS to vote. Slightly higher turnout? Crock of shit!