Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Editorial from NJ's Star-Ledger: "The list of failures only grows"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
tilsammans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 03:24 PM
Original message
Editorial from NJ's Star-Ledger: "The list of failures only grows"
Excellent editorial in today's Star-Ledger:

http://www.nj.com/opinion/ledger/editorials/index.ssf?/base/news-2/109876909336140.xml

" . . . The list of Bush administration failures in the war on terror and the war in Iraq -- from the Abu Ghraib scandal to the weekend murder by insurgents of 49 newly minted Iraqi soldiers to the lost explosives -- is getting longer. It's difficult to justify, with logic or understanding, the failures of policy and execution that have characterized President Bush's performance in Iraq. A more dismal performance as commander in chief is hard to imagine."

The last line says it all!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aden_nak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. I've been reading the Ledger less and less lately.
Mostly because I read the good columnists online, and the LTTE section usually makes my blood pressure spike. Thanks for pointing this one out to me, though!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tilsammans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. LOL! I know what you mean about the LTTEs!
:puke:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The Ledger's Editorial Staff...
Seems to have undergone something of a philosophical seachange of late. Which undoubtedly means that Paul Mulshine is just about to get all blowed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tilsammans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. About Mulshine . . .
He's often so critical of Dubya -- and yet he plans to vote for him! Or so he says in his column.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. In any case...
Just thank your lucky stars that you aren't lumbered with The Easton Express-Birdcage Liner. We are. It is vomit pressed into pages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aden_nak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Mulshine is critical of Bush for not being CONSERVATIVE enough.
Never forget that. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tilsammans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Very true . . .
I usually disagree with Mulshine's political views. Yet some of the things he says about W are so wicked, I must say I get a kick out of reading them -- especially because they come from a conservative.

I wonder if he lurks here on DU for fodder . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aden_nak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. He was a fairweather friend to Bush, but also smart.
Back in the beginning, in the early Iraq days, he was a cheerleader like the rest. But he is smart, and he jumped ship before most others did, so it makes it look like he was ahead of his time, when the truth is that the majorty was just BEHIND the times. :P I think he understood that Bush was going to become VERY unpopular, and didn't want any association. Obviously, for him and his politics, the only solution was to say that Bush isn't conservative enough.

And it is a legit complaint. Bush is NOT very conservative on a lot of issues, except for the social "wedge" issues, which Mulshine seems to care less about anyhow. Maybe that's why he was able to walk away from Bush so early.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniorPlankton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-04 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. The list of failures can't shrink!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC