|
Edited on Sat Oct-23-04 11:09 PM by sally343434
As one would expect, their "endorsement" compares the records and perceived strengths and weaknesses of Bush and Kerry. But this piece is so full of lies and propaganda that it comes off like they are withholding their endorsement from either candidate.
In the Bush portion of their piece, they state as fact the following lies:
"His commitment to a long-term struggle to promote freedom in the Arab world"
"An understanding of the deep threat posed by radical Islamic fundamentalism."
"Mr. Bush has accomplished ... the practical business of forming alliances to track terrorists"
"beginning to reshape a Middle East policy too long centered on accommodating friendly dictators."
"He has promised the large increases in foreign aid, to help poor nations cope with AIDS and for other purposes" (He has made many promises. This piece doesn't mention that none of them was serious.)
There are a lot more lies and propagandistic talking points the Post freely repeats, as well as a plethora of RNC distortions of Kerry and his positions, which are, again, stated as fact.
Frankly, I'm somewhat disappointed at this milquetoast piece, even from this bunch of whores.
|