Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Probably not Kerry's proudest moment - his meeting with Ortega

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rockydem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:42 PM
Original message
Probably not Kerry's proudest moment - his meeting with Ortega
Edited on Sat Oct-23-04 04:56 PM by rockydem


Immediately after this Ortega went to the Soviet Union and got lots of aid money.

My questions are: I'm a young guy - what were Kerry and Harkin doing down there? Was Ortega a bad guy? He was a communist dicator, no?

What about the Contras (that our government supported) made them so worrisome? I believe that many Dems had complaints against Contra tactics. Were the Contras into war crimes, indiscriminate killing?

Regardless: it still is probably not one of Kerry's better moments as public official - simply for no other reason than that Ortega proved almost immediately to be untrustworthy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. hmmmm
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockydem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I'm not a freeper, but I did find this picture at FR
go ahead and read all 79 posts of mine...

Seriously, it probably wasn't his finest moment. He was a new Senator, and he miscalculated...

I'm looking for some context about this meeting from older DUers. I'm 29.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
rockydem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. it's not going to sway me - I'm just curious
seriously

I like to talk about things - obsessing over polls is getting fuckin' old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. You're curious, all right.
And curiouser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockydem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. someone wiith the name A-Schwarzenegger
that's curiouser....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #35
54. You don't like my name?
Is that what you're saying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CAcyclist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
57. There's books and there's google
You might try reading them.

You could start with Where Is Nicaragua? by Peter Davis

Daniel Ortega was elected president of Nicaragua in 1984 and he stepped down when his US-backed rival beat him in the elections.If a foreign government funded a candidate in the US election, that would be illegal.

The only reason the Sandinistas had to go to Russia to get aid was because the US refused to give aid and instead were busy funding the contras so the Sandinista government had to spend money and men fighting them. Ortega refused aid from the Americans because it would have come with ties like no land redistribution to the poor, no nationalization of corporations.

I don't know about Kerry, but here are some words from Daniel Ortega from Where is Nicaragua?:

"If we close a plant or decide to make a shift in crops, we have to provide opportunities for jobs in other areas.We must readjust our planning to better utilize the few resources we have. The problem fo consumer goods is serious and we have not been consistent in our production. For example , today we have enough soap and cooking oil, but last month we did not and next month , we may not again. We must organize ourselves in production and in rationing so there can be a steady supply of scarce goods, even if it is a very small supply"


Now, how outrageous is that? A leader who cares and is involved in his peoples' day to day needs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Is Ortega a current cause celebre?
I think Rumsfeld shaking Saddam's hand and Bush cozying up to Bandar Bush on 9/12 are a little more interesting to the voting populace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ortega was bad, but the Contras were FAR WORSE
Read a bit about the Contras. They were absolutely vile, disgusting creatures who brought untold misery to Central America.

Kerry was genuinely interested in a peaceful settlement that would've prevented war. He made a noble trip and a sincere effort to negotiate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockydem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. "that would've have prevented war"
Did a war happen? Wasn't there already a lot of fighting? How long did int continue? For that matter - who the fuck 'won'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. Is it better to bomb than establish dialogue?
It's not like Rumsfeld with Saddam, providing aid a nd support. It's better than a chimp sitting in his cage throwing excrement at anyone outside of the cage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TimeToGo Donating Member (656 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. With all his problems
Ortega was functioning as head of state. We meet with people like that all the time. Meeting isn't the issue -- it is what the meeting is about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
38. Your point?
What is the meeting about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BUSHOUT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. WTF?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. that's code for a freeper attack...
every time a freeper posts we should write wtf...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. didn't Nixon meet with a Communist dictator, how about the saudis ?
and rummy and saddam ?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. Ortega?
I buy his salsa all the time. I little mild for my tastes, but over all, not bad. Needs some more cilantro though...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. More jalapanos. Could use more jalapenos, And some lime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:52 PM
Original message
Homemade salsa is way better n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
25. I'll have to try making it. I hear don't rub your eyes....
the peppers are hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. A noble trip to prevent bloodshed it was.
I don't see what's wrong with meeting bad people and trying to talk some sense into them. Do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. What about the Contras made them so worrisome
Ortega proved almost immediately to be untrustworthy. Who said?


I don't get you. The Contras weren't the Sandinistas. What do you want to know? What are you looking for?

Your post is meaningless and without merit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Meaningless And Without Merit...
That pretty much describes a freeper's lot in life...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockydem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. I know - our government supported the Contras
but why were Kerry and other Democrats opposed to supported the Contras?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Because They Hated The Monroe Doctrine And Wanted To See Latin America Red
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #21
46. Correction: the government didn't "support" the contras
Edited on Sat Oct-23-04 05:12 PM by The_Casual_Observer
to the contrary, there was a law (the bolland amendment) against supporting the contras. The contras were supported by an illegal covert arrangement managed by Oliver North. A number of wh and government people went to jail, including North as a result of this "enterprise". So, your buddies at freepshit are as always wrong. Anything else????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockydem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #46
51. I'm not a member of FR
you're just straight-up wrong, and thin-skinned to boot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. No thin skin
your posts are simply without merit and the stench burns my eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockydem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #52
58. it's good you're wearing that gas mask then...
sorry my posts bother you - I'm just looking for a discussion of something other than polls...

so I threw something that would be a little jolting, attention catching - you don't have to freak.

I really was just looking for some interesting discussion - and I have learned some things on this thread already. So relax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. If You Read The Thread That Appears To Be A Consensus (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockydem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. that doesn't make it true though
I'm not a member of FR - I hate freepers. I find them repugnant. I'm a true-blue Democrat, and always will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teach1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
18. The fact finding trip (see photo above) did lead to this...
http://www.startribune.com/stories/587/5011739.html

But while burnishing his liberal credentials, Kerry also surprised his allies in 1985 by signing on early to the Gramm-Rudman deficit-reduction package, which set limits on government borrowing, forcing Congress to either cut programs or raise taxes -- and which passed by wide bipartisan margins.

A year later, forging an unusual alliance with then-Sen. Jesse Helms, R-N.C., Kerry helped persuade the Foreign Relations Committee to investigate the contras and their alleged drug connections in Central America. The probe eventually exposed the Iran-contra scandal, the Reagan administration's secret scheme to trade arms for hostages held by pro-Iranian terrorists in Lebanon and use the proceeds to fund the contras. One of the scheme's main protagonists, Oliver North, would make a national name for himself in the unfolding scandal. So would Kerry.

Later, taking charge of a Senate panel on terrorism, narcotics and international operations, Kerry would launch inquiries into alleged drug trafficking by Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega and alleged banking irregularities by the Bank of Credit and Commerce International, which had strong insider ties to some powerful Washington Democrats, including former Defense Secretary Clark Clifford.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockydem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. the BCCI investigation - now that was one of Kerry's best moments
ever read the report his investigation produced? fascinating stuff...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teach1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #30
47. One of Kerry's finest moments is coming up...
..on November 2nd.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrankenforMN Donating Member (239 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
22. I am very suspicious as to why you would post this here...
Edited on Sat Oct-23-04 04:58 PM by FrankenforMN
In the GD: Campaign 2004 forum. How does this relate to the election. My opinion: You're a freeper bye-bye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
23. Why would you not meet with a democratically elected politician
in a country so close to the US which had (and has) numerous trade relations and treaties with the US? You are questioning someone for meeting with Ortega because Ortega had previously been to the Soviet Union, right? So how about all those world leaders photographed with Bush after Bush went to Russia to ask for their aid in the efforts against bin Laden? What would such a photograph with Bush tell you? Nothing. That's exactly what this photograph tells you (except that this does demonstrate that Kerry was meeting with world leaders back when Bush was a drunk failure in the oil business who'd already lost his first run for political office).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
24. What do you have wrong with democratically elected leaders?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
27. It's not like like he was negotiating a pipeline deal with the Taliban
Like Dumbya did in the 90s.

Bin Laden was a wanted criminal at the time and living in Afghanistan. And the Taliban had a horrible human rights record.

Or, consider how buddy-buddy Bush is with the Saudi royalty, and count how many 9/11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockydem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. I agree - and there's this too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
29. Daniel Ortega was ELECTED in 1984, five years after overthrowing Samoza
Can you blame Ortega for seeking aid from the Soviets after what the USA did to Cuba? I sure can't.

> Was Ortega a bad guy? He was a communist dicator, no?

The question never asked: was Anastasio Samoza Debalye a "bad guy"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
31. xray s
xrays: Ortega salsa? No way babeeeeeeee. Gotta make your own! With fresh cilantro!! ;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #31
39. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
33. Oh geeeze, where to begin....
First of all, everything you've been told about Nicaragua through mainstream sources is a LIE.

Ortega was NOT a "bad guy". The Contras were right wing terrorists doing the bidding of the U.S. right wing corporate/military elite.

Learn the truth, here's a good place to start:

http://free.freespeech.org/americanstateterrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html#Nicaragua

(excerpt)

When the Sandinistas overthrew the Somoza dictatorship in 1978, it was clear to Washington that they might well be that long-dreaded beast — “another Cuba.” Under President Carter, attempts to sabotage the revolution took diplomatic and economic forms. Under Reagan, violence was the method of choice. For eight terribly long years, the people of Nicaragua were under attack by Washington’s proxy army, the Contras, formed from Somoza’s vicious National Guard and other supporters of the dictator.

It was all-out war, aiming to destroy the progressive social and economic programs of the government, burning down schools and medical clinics, raping, torturing, mining harbors, bombing and strafing. These were Ronald Reagan’s “freedom fighters.” There would be no revolution in Nicaragua.


Kerry and Harkin were trying to do the decent thing, hoping to prevent Reagan's military intervention, but the Reagan/Bush thugs would have none of it. As for Ortega getting aid from the Soviets, who else did he have to turn to try to head off the U.S. terrorists?

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockydem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. from your link - even Carter was against them
"Under President Carter, attempts to sabotage the revolution took diplomatic and economic forms. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #40
50. Ah, so NOW you're a GD EXPERT!
Why didn't ya fire up GOOGLE before you posted? Would have saved you all those third degree burns!

Amateur!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
34. Says who?
So you don't know who the Contras were or what the issue was, but you want to tell us Ortega was "untrustworthy"?

Uh-huh....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onecitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
36. Buh-bye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
37. WTF????
:wtf:

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddhamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
41. Anastasio Somoza was a dictator.
He was ousted in 1979 by the Sandinistas, of which Daniel Ortega was a leading figure. Daniel Ortega went on to be democratically elected President, with much controversy. But how it is any different than here, i don't know.

The Communist excuse is old real old.

I am sorry but this in no way compares to Reagan declaring the Mujahadeen "The moral equivalent of our Founding Fathers" or

Reagan, Rumsfeld, etc., shaking hands with the evil-doer Saddam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEIL PRESIDENT GOD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
42. Bullshit
You say you're 29? I'm 30 and I remember perfectly well being outraged that Shithead Ronald Reagan was paying for death squads, murdering nuns and babies as they tried to overthrow Nicaragua's rightful leader.

So good of you to bluff through "79 posts" before dropping this rotten egg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
43. Daniel Ortega was a Spanish-speaking Saddam
I don't know if he was quite as evil as Saddam, but Ortega displayed a duality similar to Saddam. Carl Jung would have had a field day with the two of them.

In the 1970s, there was a dictator named Anastosio Somoza running Nicaragua. The Sandinistas formed up to depose him, and at that time the United States thought Daniel Ortega was a stand-up guy to get rid of him. (This was probably when Kerry and Harkin went down there.)

After Somoza was gone, the US kinda left Ortega swinging in the breeze (probably foreign aid disputes; on this I'm not sure) so Ortega went to Moscow for his aid.

It isn't any worse than what some members of the current administration did for Saddam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
44. NOT one of bushCartel's proudest moments...


Or IraqGate.

Or IranContra.

Or failed invasion/occupation of Afghanistan.

Or failed invasion/occupation of Iraq.

Or failed US economy.

Or failed US jobs.

Or failed US medicare.

etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
48. WTF?!!!?
:hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
49. My educated guess, to disappoint the Freeper
...has always been that Kerry has had some relationship with the See Eye Eh over the years. You do know that a shitload of them came from Skull and Bones, it's like ROTC for those guys. That's where Big George got his start. Weewee was an exception, he was too stupid for the agency to use, legacy or no. But I suspect JFK was an asset as far back as the Nam, in one fashion or another, and continued to do his thing as the years went by.

It's all good, though. He's no Andropov, but he has an understanding of that fucked up outfit on at least an operational level, the freepers are so desperate they are going after stupid shit to try to dampen down enthusiam (Rove strategy--SUPPRESS THE VOTE--sorry, we won't be letting that happen), and a LANDSLIDE will bring JFK to the White House. All good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
55. here's some background
snip---Kerry said he was not naive about the Sandinistas' repressive behavior. A Kerry adviser on the trip recalled that Kerry was "disgusted" by the foreign minister's lavish home, which had been confiscated, even while purportedly leading a "people's revolution" in the poverty-plagued country.

Nevertheless, Kerry told his Senate colleagues on Tuesday, the same day as the House vote on a $14 million contra aid package, that it was time to end "the bloodshed, the suffering, the terrorism."

"I am willing . . . to take the risk in the effort to put to test the good faith of the Sandinistas," he said.

That day, the Sandinistas collected an important victory when the House rejected Reagan's request for aid to their enemy, the contras.

A day later, Daniel Ortega, who had promised to force Soviet and Cuban advisers out of his country if aid to the contras ended, boarded an Aeroflot jet for Moscow to collect a $200 million loan.

Reagan's speechwriters couldn't have scripted a better I-told-you-so ending.

Ortega's trip to Moscow "embarrassed us, to be perfectly truthful," Kerry's powerful Massachusetts colleague, House Speaker Thomas P. O'Neill, said at the time. (But Connecticut Senator Christopher J. Dodd wondered aloud why his Democratic colleagues were so stunned: "Where did my colleagues think he was going to go, Disney World?" he said. "The man is a Marxist.")
Kerry issued his own response to the Ortega trip. "I'm as mad as anyone that is in the Soviet Union," he said. "But the fact is, if we're not willing to talk, the question has to be asked, 'Where else is he going to turn for help?' "

Ortega's Moscow trip also produced an opening for the White House to renew its crusade for aid to the contras. Six weeks later, the Democratic-led House dramatically reversed itself and approved $27 million in nonmilitary funding for the contras. The Senate also approved aid.

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/president/kerry/articles/2004/04/25/restless_intellect_drives_kerrys_positions?pg=6
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemExpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
59. Locking
too many flames.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC