Panatagraph (IL; Sued Michael Moore over F9/11) Endorses Bush*.

[displacedtexan]

This is the paper that wanted to sue Michael Moore because he moved a paragraph closer to the header date in F9/11.

I lived in Bloomington for 20 years. This endorsement is really piss poor. The editorial board knows Bush* is a disaster, but they endorse him anyway. After you read this garbage, check out the paper's front page: this paper always devotes much more space to sports than news, and half of the print version is ads.

Watch the rightwing justify choosing crap over substance!
No surprise here, folks!

In a time of war, Bush gets nod for second term

The presidential election comes down to one thing: trust. Who can the nation trust to serve the best interests of its citizens? Who can voters trust to carry out campaign promises? Who can adequately gain the trust of other nations in matters ranging from global trade to world peace?

Frankly, both President Bush and his Democratic challenger, Sen. John Kerry, have given voters reason to doubt. But we would give the edge to Bush.

The last three years of Bush's first term have been marked by unusual situations for which there was little precedent to follow. This is a nation at war, but a different kind of war.

Therefore, it is appropriate that national security in general -- the Iraq war, in particular -- has received the lion's share of attention in this campaign.

more crap...
http://www.pantagraph.com/stories/101704/opi_20041017003.shtml