The Heritage Foundation? Surprise!

[George_S]

Josh Silver, executive director of the nonprofit advocacy group Free Press, said: "Sinclair is putting their political interests ahead of journalistic standards by calling this anti-Kerry documentary news, which it's not. . . . It's reprehensible at best, illegal at worst."

But Heritage Foundation media analyst Mark Tapscott called it a free speech issue, saying: "Why are we even thinking about limiting what a media organization can publish? There are lots of things in the world that are unfair."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25406-2004Oct11.html

[girl gone mad]

1. Why bother trying and locking up murderers, too?

Afterall, there's lots of crime in the world.

[LittleClarkie]

2. Or getting out all the vote in Iraq

After all, nothing's perfect.

[loudsue]

3. One of my nephews works for the Heritage Foundation.....

He drank the kool-aid, and signed up. :puke:

It is MORE than distressing to me. They're a certifiably wacko bunch of theocratic nazis. He used to be a good kid.

:kick::kick::kick:

[Warren DeMontague]

4. Didn't the Heritage Foundation go nuts over Janet Jackson's boob?

Right. They just Cringe at the idea of censorship.

[Fluffdaddy]

5. People please Stop posting links where you to register................

Just post the piece here in full....................If it's not to long

Thanks

register... rant off

[A-Schwarzenegger]

6. Copyright law says only four paragraphs can be posted. n/t

[liberal N proud]

7. They are just following the examples set by FAUX and CNN and all the other

networks.
Journalistic standards have all but evaporated in the last 12 years.