Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Faux & Friends: "Kerry had Substance and Style, but Too Slick"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ksoze Donating Member (635 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 07:37 AM
Original message
Faux & Friends: "Kerry had Substance and Style, but Too Slick"
Edited on Sat Oct-09-04 07:44 AM by ksoze
Every time I think Fox is coming around, they fall back. Just summerized their post debate report with only anti-Kerry call-ins and live street interviews and then ended the segment with, "Kerry has the style and substance but...I dunno maybe too slick for our viewers".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Francesca Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. well I have to agree with his last line
substance is a little much for fox viewers.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah...and Faux and friends have shit for brains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skylarmae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. shouldn't faux news be a campaign expense for georgie porgie's
bookkeepers? I think so!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. "Slick" is their synonym for "intelligent"....
We would prefer a president that is not too smart. We would prefer Woody Woodpecker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. LOL - Woody Woodpecker
I think he needs to start showing up at Bush rallies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. America has become proud of being stupid
I've been trying to listen to Republicans to understand why they support the shrub, but everytime I listen I find myself concluding that they're just stupid. After the debate I caught one complaining on C-span that Kerry had a plan. Having a plan, being able to think, articulate... these are bad things. People support bush because of things like, "he's strong." Well how about giving a reason why you think that, or are Republicans just unburdened by the thought processe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diana52 Donating Member (162 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. Ooooooh!
"slick", I think I need to write them and say, "thank you for energizing our base!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Was_Immer Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. omg someone should definately do that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ksoze Donating Member (635 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
9. The Bizzaro World Channel
As I listened to these Faux's this am, it made no sense. They were lauding Kerry's intelleigence, comand of the facts, confidence and ability to answer any question easily - yet he is too slick.

At one point one of them said that he is too robotic and "kept using names from previous attendees in his replys". They cannot understand that Kerry can remember what someone said a few questins ago and can join that into his answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
10. He is so New England.
That does not always make it all over the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerryin2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
11. So we have a choice between slick and unstable?
Edited on Sat Oct-09-04 08:04 AM by kerryin2004
I will take the slick man any day over the irrational and unstable chimp!


Jesus, this man acted like he was going to attack Charlie Gibson, and he has the finger on the button! Bush is always sending messages to all his fundies, and I am a bit worried that he may try to bring the end of days on his own!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kinkistyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
12. If as in "Slick Willy", hell I'll TAKE it!
Bill Clinton was renouned as being "Slick" and look how he ended up :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
13. That sounds like a dig at their own viewers
Probably deserved but a little odd regardless.

Are they saying they have the contempt for their viewers that someone who watches FAUX so richly deserves?

So not only are they scum, they are hypocrites as well.

I love the FAUX talking heads: they don't even pretend to be newsmen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
14. not enough of a freaking moron for fox viewers....another good reason
to vote for Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CANDO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
15. This means he is sooooo smart that he can't be trusted.
That's where all the slick willie attacks against Clinton were aimed. If a person is really this intelligent, then he can use it to outsmart your average republican. These people wallow in unsophistication.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
16. By too slick did they mean too intelligent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
17. jeez-" to slick for our viewers"
only on fox-that insult just went over the heads of 99% of their audience!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. They are doing the "make fun of the smart kid in class" bit
That is what the goal of this is. Plus they have nothing else to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
19. Years and years of letting talk show hosts do your thinking for you does
this.

Wingnuts' brains have atrophied after listening to years of Rush and Hanity et.al. They can't come up with an original thought anymore. It's like someone using a crutch or wearing a cast when they don't have to. Their muscles shrink and become flabby and weak. Wing nuts brains have become flabby and weak. Someone else who is intelligent is "slick" or "elitist." Laura Ingrahm uses this idea all the time calling Kerry and Dems elitists. That helps the dummies identify with Bush their dummy leader and it isn't insulting to them, it helps rally them.

Is it any wonder why they vote against their own economic and social interests?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
20. They used "slick" for a reason other than that saying "too smart"
for our viewers is too truthful.

Why waste all the millions spent character-assassinating President Clinton when you can recall all that conditioning by simply re-using
the word?

Maybe we should start calling them Pavlovian Republicans...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC