Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

video clip of plane hitting pentagon...they should use this.....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 12:40 PM
Original message
video clip of plane hitting pentagon...they should use this.....
made on a PC...hehehe...think the gubberment can make on this good ;)




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bushknew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thats why I want

to see the video and not a series of stills. ; - )

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chomp Donating Member (602 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. That really is quite an incredible job
(if I may be glib and nerdy about such a horrible event).

If I were told that was real, I'd be more likely to believe it than not. Amazing.

So a question: if it was MIHOP, why not just fake up a tape like this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. They are probably working on it as we speak
First work up outrage at more tape without any plane. Then, once the 911 anti-official theory movement has become defined by "no plane at the Pentagon" release the "plane" tape and wipe out the whole movement in one fell swoop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. At least yours looks real...
They need to release ALL of the tapes that were confiscated that day..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Whatever we do eventually see, there has been plenty of time to
make it whatever it needs to be. The special effects in Star Wars were considered unbelievable at the time (1977). Just think what they can do now, things we probably never dreamed of.

If the government wants us to see an American Airlines plane hit the Pentagon on 9/11/2001, by George, that's what we'll see. (Pun intended.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. My question is
Is it possible for an inexperienced pilot to fly a plane that low? For that matter, could an experienced pilot pull this off?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thats freakin awesonme ROFL good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ediedidcare Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. Photoshop Expert Here...
I did a little experiment using one frame from the old gas station stills and the corresponding
frame from the new stills released today. What I found was that the Pentagon perspective roof line was a dead-on
match with only a slight rotation to the left on the new shot ( these shots were the frames with the orange explosion bloom
consistent in both shots down to the specks of debris).

Everything lined up except for the immediate foreground - it is as if the same camera was used except the new shot
thrusts forward about 10-15 feet and eliminates the service station island there by giving an unobstructed view of the
speeding nosecone ( bullshit if this is 77) this object immediately smears out to a white streak identical to the old
still collection.

In my opinion this is a shockingly crude fake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. thanks-- interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sweet Pea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. What "old gas station stills"?
Wasn't aware there were any "old gas stations" around there that had photos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. First of all
it wasn't a gas station, it's the guard shack

secondly, the two cameras use wide angle lenses, and the two cameras are relatively close together, so the fact that the top of the building lines up isn't too surprising.

there are other surprising features of the videos, but I don't think that's one of them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-18-06 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. very interesting
i'd sure like to see a side by side, or better still, an overlay to illustrate this idea. it is about what i'd expect from bushco. though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lies and propaganda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. fuck! at least theres actually a plane in it
hysterical!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-18-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
14. This "joke" is more serious than you think ...
If the plane is to scale vis a vis the Pentagon, you are showing what the video should look like.

The fact that it looks nothing like that is a very serious indictment of what it is the video actually shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Klimmer Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-18-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I agree with your assessment. If flight 77 really plowed into . . .
the Pentagon, then we would see something similiar to this mock-up. Even flying at cruise altitude speed there would be many frames of a large commercial aircraft at full and proper scale, and we don't have anything remotely showing that except a smoke trail behind something much smaller. In my opinion it is a small military jet with cruise missile on board, or just a cruise missile.

No flight 77, (a 757) hit the Pentagon. Something else did. The Official 9-11 Commission Report Conspiracy Hypothesis is invalid and must be rejected. That is science. We know they didn't do science. We know they are lying. Even their own evidence proves they are lying.

I don't think they will ever provide the confiscated videos from the gas station, hotel or any other good clear footage unless they are forced to. Then they just might conveniently get lost or simply destroyed. Perhaps they already are. Incriminating evidence like that is too dangerous to be allowed to exist. They'll just simple say, "Mybad? Oops, sorry."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Sep 22nd 2014, 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC