If a thread has 91+ recommendations - is on the 'greatest' page,

[alittlelark]

Is wrapped in tin-foil....

And appears to have NO attackers.... as almost ALL others do....

Could it be disinformation?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x4104485


Just wondering...

:tinfoilhat: :tinfoilhat:

[beam me up scottie]

1. Gee, why don't you check the dozen plus sources cited on it

and find out ?

Conspiracy envy ?

I would think you'd realize that this is a serious crime and if it pans out, it can be used to take down the bush cabal.

Gosh, why aren't you helping to dig for the truth about this ?

I guess that getting to the truth is only important if it's your version.

[alittlelark]

2. I saw the sources.... there were many sources to past

issues that were 'debunked' w/ one small shred of fraud.

WHY have none of the standard nay-sayers entered the thread? You know who they are.

1-the story is waaay to tight to try
2-the story had a hole that they will tear it apart with at the right time.

I'm sorry.... I know I sound paranoid - but I am.


WHY has no one posted to say "Sir, you are reading too much into this....."

Sometimes a void is interesting.

[beam me up scottie]

3. Which of it has

been debunked ?

Did you do any research on the subject ?

Because I'd like to see you debunk it, if you actually find something,it's better to know now than find out later.

I find it telling that someone is willing to disbelieve something just because it seems to be true, without knowing anything about it or even attempting to educate themselves.

[alittlelark]

4. Scottie.... I guage from gut instinct AND research.

I have researched NONE of the links or connections. I am currently sanding, painting and tiling my bathroom (almost at the same time in different areas). I have come to DU 3 times during the day, and now for an hour or so at night.


My BIG question remains.... why no nay-sayers?

"You are misinformed Sir...."



I had 2 deleted threads 3 days ago - one was on the greatest page for 19 or so recommendations. It got locked... guess what - tin-foil issues regarding the London Bombings and Terror drills w/ Peter Powers.


Sorry - I'm wondering why this one has NO detractors.

[beam me up scottie]

5. Occam's Razor ?

But if you prefer to think it's a DU conspiracy because your gut instinct tells you so, go with it.

Naysayers like me only naysay when there's no evidence, I found enough to convince me.

[alittlelark]

6. Find one of 10 + B*SH conspiracies that went the way we wanted

... in public opinion.


Evidence, Evidence, Evidence,Evidence,Evidence,Evidence,Evidence,Evidence, Inserted untruth to destroy it all, Evidence, Evidence, Evidence,Evidence,Evidence,Evidence,Evidence,Evidence,Evidence,Evidence,Evidence,Evidence,Evidence,Evidence,Evidence,


I hope I am just up late and paranoid.... but has a detractor entered the thread yet?



I'm goin' to bed now.

[beam me up scottie]

7. That's what I thought.

Thread envy.

Better luck next time.

[nashville_brook]

8. same here -- the issue was cleared up later

when skinner issued a message about the locking/deleting. said as long as we weren't linking to inflammatory sites as citations, that the threads would be okay. he added that the only non-inflammatory site he had seen was the CBC. since then, other non-inflammatory sites started carrying the details that were orginally posted at prisonplanet, etc.

i think my big thing with all this confusion is that it hindered lots of good footwork. i've been in journalism for years and a vacuum in information is always a good thing for independent researchers b/c usually the vacuum points to the big dogs not being able to cover the story b/c of "relationships." not wanting to go out on a limb. that's the greatest strength of indies -- we don't have the reputations to protect. it allows us to break difficult stories.

i guess the good news is it's being picked up elsewhere.