|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-25-05 10:26 AM Original message |
Why did the Flight 93 Hijackers Wait So Long to Start the Hijack? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Borg (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-25-05 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
1. Tom Burnett sitting in Flight X ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-25-05 01:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. My guess is flight 93 was part of the hijacking exercise run that day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-25-05 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
3. 9:14 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-25-05 04:33 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I've seen that earlier hijack time, and I don't see how |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-25-05 06:02 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. The FAA was not tipped off... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-25-05 08:44 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Good points, but overall the crater looks fake to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-25-05 10:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Do you have comprehensive crash scene photos? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-26-05 10:30 AM Response to Reply #11 |
18. Actually, we have a very extensive description of the crash scene |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-26-05 05:38 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. What about people who saw a passenger plane going down? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-26-05 11:17 PM Response to Reply #11 |
29. Could the plane have been crashed into the lake? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-25-05 11:09 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. There is as much case for jamming by the C 130H at the site as shoot down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-25-05 11:20 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. makes sense to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-26-05 10:30 PM Response to Reply #15 |
26. There's some really advanced technology out there these days |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Borg (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-26-05 01:48 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. C-130 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-26-05 10:34 PM Response to Reply #17 |
27. Is it possible some of the witnesses mistook C130 for Fl 93? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-26-05 10:34 AM Response to Reply #3 |
19. Actually, you mean 9:16am. But what on earth happened before 9:16am?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-26-05 10:14 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. you're right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-25-05 07:07 PM Response to Original message |
6. Somehow Flight 77 and Flight 93 are connected |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-25-05 08:42 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. I agree that flight 77 was probably waiting for flight 93 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-25-05 09:28 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Flight 93 had further to fly at that point ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-25-05 10:42 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. Yes I think the initial diversion of Flt 77 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-25-05 11:12 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. did you figure out if Flight X at Cleveland was likely Fl 93 as FAA said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-25-05 09:46 PM Response to Original message |
10. "They" were thinking EITHER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-26-05 01:15 AM Response to Original message |
16. And there's poor George Bush, stuck in that classroom, killing time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
staticstopper (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-26-05 02:46 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Ya, I remember him looking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-26-05 04:11 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Another weirdness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-26-05 10:29 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Are originals out there somewhere? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-26-05 10:46 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. No, they were scrubbed a long time ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-26-05 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
23. What I want to know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-27-05 12:08 PM Response to Reply #23 |
32. Because we can't handle the truth! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-27-05 12:11 AM Response to Original message |
30. delay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-27-05 12:06 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. How so? What are you getting at? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-27-05 12:16 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. they were buying time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-27-05 02:15 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. But if they had to buy some time, why did they take so long to hijack the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-27-05 02:25 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-27-05 10:23 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Would you mind writing out your flight 93 scenario? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-29-05 10:02 AM Response to Reply #37 |
38. more on delay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-29-05 11:07 AM Response to Reply #38 |
39. So you're saying a phantom flight 93 was the one shown on the flight path |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-29-05 11:19 AM Response to Reply #39 |
40. the fake hijacking corresponded with the landing of the real 93 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-29-05 11:56 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. I understand now-- makes sense. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-30-05 07:49 AM Response to Reply #40 |
42. However, why would the phantom flight 93 care what the real plane was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-30-05 12:27 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. because.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-30-05 11:05 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. Isn't this essentially the physics911 site Operation Pearl? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-31-05 12:14 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. As far as I can tell, yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-27-05 02:58 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. re: what you really want to know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSammo1 (788 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-30-05 07:33 PM Response to Original message |
44. Because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC