Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RICO LAWSUIT: linking it all:Defendants concealed fact of ample warning:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
chomskysright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 02:17 PM
Original message
RICO LAWSUIT: linking it all:Defendants concealed fact of ample warning:



4
A. THE WTC TWIN TOWERS, AS WELL AS WTC BUILDING #7, WERE
DESTROYED BY CONTROLLED DEMOLITION, AS CLEARLY PROVEN
BY THE LAWS OF PHYSICS; THIS DEMOLITION COULD ONLY HAVE
BEEN AN "INSIDE JOB."……………………………………………………P. 38

B. FEMA, WHICH REMOVED THE EVIDENCE BEFORE IT COULD BE
INDEPENDENTLY EXAMINED, MAINTAINS A BLACK-OP SHADOW
GOVERNMENT DESIGNED TO REPLACE THE ELECTED GOVERNMENT
OF THE UNITED STATES…………………………………………………..P. 47

C. DEFENDANTS DELIBERATELY CONCEALED THE FACT THAT THEY
HAD AMPLE WARNINGS OF TERRORIST ATTACKS AND FAILED TO
ACT ON THEM, A WAR ON TERRORISM BEING NECESSARY TO
JUSTIFY THEIR POLITICAL
AGENDA………………………………………………………………….….P. 65

D. DEFENDANTS CONSPIRED TO AND DID ALLOW THE ATTACKS TO
HAPPEN BY DELAYING MILITARY INTERCEPTION OF THE HIJACKED
PLANES………………………………………………………………………P. 80

1. FLIGHT 11 (NORTH TOWER WTC) COULD HAVE BEEN BUT WAS
NOT INTERCEPTED………………………………………………...P. 83

2. FLIGHT 175 COULD HAVE BEEN BUT WAS NOT
INTERCEPTED………………………………………………….…..P. 88

3. FLIGHT 77 NOT ONLY COULD HAVE BEEN INTERCEPTED BUT
WAS ALLOWED TO FLY UNCONTESTED A FULL 50 MINUTES
BEFORE STRIKING THE PENTAGON…………………………….P. 95

4. AN UNPRECEDENTED NATIONWIDE "GROUND STOP" ORDER,
WHICH MUST HAVE HAD WHITE HOUSE APPROVAL,
PREVENTED EVEN THE MILITARY FROM FLYING AND
ALLOWED THE ATTACKS TO PROCEED………………………P. 102

5. THE CRASH OF FLIGHT 93 IN SOMERSET COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA, RAISES SERIOUS ADDITIONAL UNANSWERED
QUESTIONS………………………………………………………...P. 108

6. SOME ADDITIONAL REASONS TO DOUBT THE OFFICIAL
STORY OF 9-11……………………………………………………..P. 117

E. THE ENTERPRISE HAS ENGAGED IN A CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT
ELECTION FRAUD………………………………………………………...P. 124

F. ENTERPRISE'S FLORIDA RECOUNT RIOT: ADDITIONAL
PREDICATE ACTS UNDER RICO………………………………………...P. 136

G. ADDITIONAL ALLEGATIONS AS TO INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS,
PREDICATE ACTS OF RACKETEERING COMMITTED BY THEM, AND
THEIR ROLES IN THE RICO ENTERPRISE……………………………...P. 139
H. THE FOREGOING FACTS SUPPORT CLAIMS AGAINST THE
DEFENDANTS FOR MULTIPLE ACTS OF CONSPIRACY,
RACKETEERING, DOMESTIC TERRORISM AND OTHER CRIMES…P. 146
IV. COUNTS…………………………………………………………………………….P. 149
1. MISPRISION OF A FELONY (18 U.S.C. Section 4)…………………………...P. 149
2. MISPRISION OF TREASON (18 U.S.C. Section 2382)………………………...P. 151
3. PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY (18 U.S.C. Section 1962c)…….P. 152
4. RACKETEERING ACTIVITY (18 U.S.C. Section 1961(1))……………………P. 154
5. CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT RICO VIOLATIONS\
(18 U.S.C. Section 1962 (b, c))……………………………………………….….P. 155
6. INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF (18 U.S.C. Section 1964c)…...P. 156
7. INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (18 U.S.C. Section 1964c)……………………………...P. 157
8. COMMON LAW INJUNCTIVE RELIEF……………………………………. ...P. 159
9. DECLARATORY JUDGMENT (28 U.S.C. Section 2201 et seq.)……………...P. 159
10. INJUNCTIVE RELIEF……………………………………………………….…P. 161
11. RELIEF UNDER ANTI-TERRORISM ACT (18 U.S.C. Section 2333)…….….P. 162
12. RELIEF FOR AND FROM CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY………………..P.163

http://www.911forthetruth.com/pdfs/Rodriguezvs.Bush%20.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
1956 Donating Member (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. This needs to be PUBLIC !
OH< MY GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. no
it needs to be tossed into the trash so serious people can find out what happened.

bye bye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. i don't buy all of this, but the fact that NO ONE WAS FIRED OVER 9/11 ....
... is astounding!

if any sane person were president and the largest commercial center AND our fricken MILITARY HEADQUARTERS were attacked, successfully, by 4 teams armed with box cutters, and no planes were scrambled, etc, HEADS WOULD ROLL!!

at a MINIMUM, there would be a major reorg, if only to make it LOOK like some action were taken to punish a bureaucracy for unacceptable results.

how on earth can no one get fired over this is absolutely inexplicable unless certain people are being protected.

again, maybe shrub himself was in the dark, but key people near him had to have participated, and in any event, shrub is helping to protect them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. As a comedian on Bill Maher said a few months ago
"You get fired at the Gap if you fold a sweater wrong, and NOBODY lost their job because of 9/11?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chomskysright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. I've floated pieces of it around into other DU threads where...
there is more activity.

PASS IT AROUND. THIS IS VERY BIG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. RICO BFEE ASAP
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. it'll be laughed out of court
it'll be laughed out of court, as well it should be for the "controlled demolition" alone. and the idea that the "ground stop order" stopped the military!!!! Not to mention FEMA's "shadow government!" If it wasn't so tragic this would be the funnest law suit ever! as it is, it is merely pathetic.


bye bye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graphixtech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. Update on Rico Lawsuit
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=125x35791

Also, this news in a recent email note from Phil Berg:

"On 04/22/05, I was in Federal Court arguing against the government's motion to dismiss or transfer my RICO case against Bush and his cronies for 911.

My client, William "Willie" Rodriguez, was in Court with me

The Judge gave me a great deal of latitude in allowing me to argue my case and permitted me to state critical evidence."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frederik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm very sceptical
to that lawsuit and to Mr Berg. "As clearly proven by the laws of physics"... Sure, I too find the three collapses conspicuous to say the least, but to say that the laws of physics have clearly proven that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition is not only semantically meaningless but also factually wrong. Nothing is clearly proven in this case - and it won't ever be, as the evidence is now driving around in the form of Chinese automobiles.

He really expects the court to find that the government did 9/11?

I agree with a lot of the allegations here, but this will lead nowhere. I don't think the powers that be are losing any sleep over Mr Berg's lawsuit.

Sibel Edmonds' lawsuit is the one to watch.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Last Lemming Donating Member (806 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Gravity
and the concept of resistance. You may remember that from middle school science class
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC