What evidence is there that Richard Fuisz was CIA? nt

[hack89]

[k-robjoe]

1. I assumed that he was, and that it was "common knowledge"

But your question made me check some more. And this quote makes me wonder if it really was "common knowledge" at the time that Lindauer gave that testimony.

Sunday Herald :

"United Nations diplomats are outraged that the US government is apparently suppressing a potential key trial witness. Diplomats are now demanding that the CIA agent, Dr Richard Fuisz, be released from the gagging order. Fuisz, a multi-millionaire businessman and pharmaceutical researcher, was, according to US intelligence sources, the CIA's key operative in the Syrian capital Damascus during the 1980s where he also had business interests."

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4156/is_20000528/ai_n13949725/

[k-robjoe]

2. Big hmmm...

This is making me go "hmmm...."

The story about the testimony about the Lockerbie bombing seems legit.

But then, if it his, then she and her CIA-handler can hardly have been trusted by the CIA after that episode.

So how can the rest of her story possibly be true?

Hmmmm....

[Ghost in the Machine]

3. Police chief- Lockerbie evidence was faked

Police chief- Lockerbie evidence was faked

Published Date: 28 August 2005
By MARCELLO MEGA

A FORMER Scottish police chief has given lawyers a signed statement claiming that key evidence in the Lockerbie bombing trial was fabricated.

The retired officer - of assistant chief constable rank or higher - has testified that the CIA planted the tiny fragment of circuit board crucial in convicting a Libyan for the 1989 mass murder of 270 people.

{snip}

The fragment of circuit board therefore enabled Libya - and Megrahi - to be placed at the heart of the investigation. However, Thurman was later unmasked as a fraud who had given false evidence in American murder trials, and it emerged that he had little in the way of scientific qualifications.

Then, in 2003, a retired CIA officer gave a statement to Megrahi's lawyers in which he alleged evidence had been planted.
http://news.scotsman.com/scotland/Police-chief-Lockerbie-evidence-was.2656485.jp

[k-robjoe]

4. I don´t have a problem with that

Here is what I do have a problem with:

Lindauer was approached by her handler, dr. Richard Fuisz ;

"...he spoke to US congressional aide Susan Lindauer, telling her he knew the identities of the Lockerbie bombers and claiming they were not Libyan."

And she testified about this. ( And he was gagged. )

This is in 1994 (95?).

So how are we supposed to believe that Lindauer and Fuisz were "back in business", working for the CIA, in 2001, when she allegedly was informed about the coming terrorist attack?

That doesn´t make any sense.

[k-robjoe]

5. Re : Police chief- Lockerbie evidence was faked

"Lockerbie documents: Labour 'did all it could' to secure bomber's release
The former Labour Government did "all it could" to help Libya secure the release of the Lockerbie bomber, Britain's most senior civil servant said today."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/8308169/Lockerbie-documents-Labour-did-all-it-could-to-secure-bombers-release.html