Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Swiss newspaper asks if Bush was behind 9/11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 11:46 AM
Original message
Swiss newspaper asks if Bush was behind 9/11
Blick, a newspaper with a daily circulation of 275,000, has released an article asking many questions about the official version of the events of 9/11. They are referencing some work done by local professors at the University of Switzerland, Albert A. Stahel (63) and Daniele Ganser (34).

Stahel, an expert in strategy, commented, "something is wrong" and called the official line "incomplete". Gansers stance is much harder - believing that Bush and co. could be responsible "The more we explore, the more we doubt on Bush's version...Bush has lied so much already!"

http://current.com/items/88991299_swiss_newspaper_asks_...


The only evidence that says bu$h was not involved is that it worked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. love your last line
it might be sufficient to prove the case though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. It worked
but not as well as planned - and they got caught. Most of the rest of the world is on to them - and a good deal of Americans are too. We were supposed to be looking more like Nazi Germany about now. We still have to hold our breath some before we get to 1/21/09.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. It worked ok
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. 'The only evidence that says bu$h was not involved is that it worked.'
Oh. my. god. How true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. He's involved all right. His involvement at best was deliberate
neglect of his duty to defend and protect this country. He (they) knew what was coming. They (the whole criminal cabal) must have thought that it was the best thing that ever happened to them, their dream come true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's sort of like being a little pregnant.
You either are or aren't. Too many open questions for me to conclude one way or the other. I do know that all of the evil that they have done was rooted in what happened that day. If we every get a chance to see Cheney's secret energy policy meeting minutes, that might provide the motives to conclude they were very much involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. He wasn't in charge.
Cheney was.

Sitting in a classroom reading a children's book in front of the entire world while America was "under attack" pretty much tells us all who was in charge.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. From what I've heard here
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 06:11 PM by seemslikeadream
You can't say that,


Where are the all knowing ones? Is there a reason why you have not come here? I think I know, thy name is not SLaD, maybe could it be...........mmmmmmmmm PERSONAL? It only took 6 minutes for me but I am special around here, you got 6 hours and counting. ;) AND YOU GOT 6 VOTES I AM SO JEALOUS! But I got a lot of replies :P I guess you can feel the love


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Oh, the OP can say it, SLAD...
it's just stupid because a paper quoting someone questioning something is not the same thing as the paper asking the questions itself.

In fact, none of you will answer the question I keep posing. I wonder why. It's pretty simple. If a newspaper runs an article on an Intelligent Design proponent, quoting questions in which the ID proponent denies evolution, is that the same thing as the newspaper questioning/denying evolution? You can substitute the Holocaust for evolution, if you'd like. The answer is still no in both cases. I'm waiting for one of you brilliant "truthers" to answer yes, then try to explain that answer while the rest of us dissolve in laughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Take it up with
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 07:50 PM by seemslikeadream
liberal N proud


and spend all night arguing with her, I am done with you


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I'm sure she'll see the thread., SLAD
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 07:51 PM by SDuderstadt
In the meantime, I wonder why you can't answer my simple question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. get a clue
you've had two threads deleted on the subject
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Because you can't answer the question?
Why are they deleted? Do you find questions you can't answer threatening? That wouldn't surprise me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. BECAUSE YOU BROKE THE RULES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. And how would that be, SLAD?
I'm all ears. Asking questions is against the rules? Be specific.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. This is interesting....
In reviewing the rules again, I noticed that posting messages that are incoherent is a violation of the rules. That probably explains why some of yours disappear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. You have just proven this is all personal
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 08:07 PM by seemslikeadream
thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I see....still can't answer that question...
why am I not surprised? Does it have anything to do with undermining your point? It's not personal, SLAD. You just get a lot of it because you post a lot of questionable stuff without vetting it. It makes us liberals look silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. bullshit
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 08:13 PM by seemslikeadream
and quit hijacking this thread with your personal grudges
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. You mean you CAN answer the question?
Then do so. Unless, of course, you'd be forced to answer no and that undermines your previous claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. "That probably explains why some of yours disappear"... Said the guy who had TWO posts pulled Monday
I've handed your ass to you before. Why do you ignore me, but like to hassle a lady? I bet *I* know the answer to that question... you're a real big *man*, huh?


I can't stand gutless cowards...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Aug 27th 2014, 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC