Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Q & A on Israel’s Use of White Phosphorus in Gaza

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
DogPoundPup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 02:20 PM
Original message
Q & A on Israel’s Use of White Phosphorus in Gaza
Since the beginning of Israel’s ground offensive in Gaza on January 3, 2009, there have been numerous media reports about the possible use by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) of white phosphorus (WP), a chemical substance used in military ordnance that has several tactical uses. The IDF has told Human Rights Watch and reporters that it is not using WP in Gaza. On January 7, an IDF spokesman told CNN, “I can tell you with certainty that white phosphorus is absolutely not being used.”

Human Rights Watch believes the IDF is using WP in Gaza. On January 9, Human Rights Watch researchers on a ridge overlooking Gaza from the northwest observed multiple air-bursts of artillery-fired WP that appeared to be over the Gaza City/Jabaliya area. In addition, Human Rights Watch has analyzed photographs taken by the media on the Israel-Gaza border showing Israeli artillery units handling fused WP artillery shells, as well as video of air bursts over Gaza followed by tendrils of smoke and flame that are highly indicative of WP use.

Israel appears to be using WP as an “obscurant” (a chemical used to hide military operations), a permissible use in principle under international humanitarian law (the laws of war). However, WP also has a significant, incidental, incendiary effect that can severely burn people and set structures, fields, and other civilian objects in the vicinity on fire. The potential for harm to civilians is magnified by Gaza’s high population density, among the highest in the world.

Human Rights Watch believes that the use of WP in densely populated areas of Gaza violates the requirement under international humanitarian law to take all feasible precautions to avoid civilian injury and loss of life. This concern is amplified given the technique evidenced in media photographs and viewed by Human Rights Watch researchers on January 9 of air-bursting WP projectiles, which spreads the burning wafers over a wider area, thereby increasing the likelihood of civilian casualties and damage to civilian objects.

snip~
Why is WP controversial?

WP burns anything it touches. When air-burst as an obscurant, it can fall over an area about the size of a football field, about the same area affected by a cluster bomb. Those below may receive horrific skin burns, and it can set structures, fields, and other objects on fire. Using WP against military targets in densely populated areas would also raise concerns where the weapon could not be directed at a specific military target and thus would be indiscriminate in its impact, in violation of the laws of war. Humanitarian law also places restrictions on the use of incendiary weapons like WP against military personnel when other weapons are available.

Read the entire article ... http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2009/01/10/q-israel-s-use-white-phosphorus-gaza
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. WP. a chemical used to hide military operations. Any video links ?
Where is this WP ?
Does it hide IDF troop movements ?

Gaza hospitals should be teeming with burn coverage by now.


http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=23a_1231593272

15 minute vid about stringer reports from "a biased" angle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Its use appears to be limited, no anti personnel usage claimed
Edited on Sat Jan-10-09 09:46 PM by HardcoreProgressive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Limited to allowed purposes, not anti personnel in nature.
Some may argue that in an urban setting that anti personnel is a foreseeable side effect. I'll leave that for the post combat legal skirmishes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. A quick search on YouTube turns up plenty
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owQI9NDR2ro

It can be used to create a smoke screen to hide troop movements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC