Haaretz.com
Tue., August 29, 2006 Elul 5, 5766
By Ze'ev Schiff
On July 18, the sixth day of war with Hezbollah, a meeting was held in Jerusalem between Chief of Staff Dan Halutz, Military Intelligence head Major General Amos Yadlin and the security cabinet. In their assessment, Halutz and Yadlin told Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and the ministers that Israel had essentially achieved most of its aims in the war.
The implication was that it was possible, at that stage, to accept a cease-fire called for by the government of Lebanon and Hezbollah. However, the matter was not brought to a vote and the war lasted another 34 days.
Why was this option not discussed? Was the cabinet merely a debate club? How were the major decisions of the war made? This is one example of how the decision-making process worked. For example, what went on between the office of Defense Minister Amir Peretz and that of Olmert when it came to running the war?
However successful a military investigation into the war will be, it will not touch these questions. It will deal with the decision-making in the top ranks of the IDF. If a commission of inquiry is set up, whatever kind it may be, it will not be able to ignore these issues. The question of whether Israel could have stopped the war at an earlier stage is only one important example of the issues involved.
<more>
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/755390.html