Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lautenberg Speaks Out on Gun Laws, Proposes New Bill - banning high capacity magazines

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 10:04 AM
Original message
Lautenberg Speaks Out on Gun Laws, Proposes New Bill - banning high capacity magazines
Edited on Thu Feb-24-11 10:05 AM by jpak
http://berkeleyheights.patch.com/articles/lautenberg-speaks-out-on-gun-laws-proposes-new-bill

New Jersey Senator Frank Lautenberg (D) paid a special visit to the Plainfield city hall annex on the morning of Wednesday, February 23 to discuss new legislation that would re-instate a federal ban on large-capacity gun magazines.

The new bill, which is an effort to significantly decrease the chances for gun violence nationwide, comes partially in response to the January 8 shooting of Arizona Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords (D). Congresswoman Giffords is still recovering from a gunshot to the head by Jared Lee Loughner, which she received in an attack that left eighteen people wounded and six dead, including a nine-year-old girl, at a “Congress on Your Corner” event in Tucson, Arizona.

“The fact that Congresswoman Giffords is striving so courageously to regain her health is a constant reminder (of the need for strict gun laws)," said Lautenberg.

The original federal ban on large-capacity gun magazines lapsed in 2004, leaving it to individual states to devise their own gun laws for the general public. If the senator’s new bill becomes law, the new federal ban will resonate in New Jersey despite the fact that large-capacity gun magazines have already been made illegal on a state level. People can still purchase these magazines in other states with more lenient gun laws and bring them across state borders.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. OK I'll go first
You do recall what happened the last time they tried this shit right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. It'll be different this time. We'll do it better.
And we'll have another decade of fucking republicans in the white house, house, and senate, and a republican majority in the supreme court for the next 25 freakin years.

*Punches self in groin*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I, Sarah Heath Palin. Do solemly swear
To give Atheist Crusader a heart attack right here in the gungeon on DU

Yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I didn't know demons had middle names.
Learn something new every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I think Heath was her maiden name
Of course I often wonder exactly who Jack's Bison is named after http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hXlPY9OS1k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Remmah2 Donating Member (971 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. How much gun crime is caused by the ATF? Project Gunrunner?
Yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bold Lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. Second verse, same as the first.
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glassunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. No thanks... Sen. Lautenberg is not interested in any of my civil rights.
He enjoys writing bills that strip the individual of their rights to due process(S. 34-112th, 2820-111th) and he is also a fan of government black-lists(S. 35,34-112th, 2820-111th).

No thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
beevul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I wish I could rec your post, well said.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Loughner would have committed this act with an antique black powder 6 shot revolver
"... if that had been his only option!"

Glue logic:
It is a term that means circuits built from flip-flops, ands and ors, but in this case it means something else. A product by Testors

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mediator Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Fine, I'll support a ban on 6 shot black powder revolvers.
Will that satisfy you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. who are you? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mediator Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. mediator. Can't you read?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. Except (1) he wants to ban standard factory magazines, not just high-capacity mags, and
(2) he doesn't want to reinstate the 1994 non-ban, he wants to go waaaaaaay beyond it.

The overwhelming majority of states have considered and rejected such bans, not that it matters to Lautenberg et al.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. This is why our government can't solve the job situation ...
Politicians are so divorced from reality or so interested in playing idiotic political games that they honestly believe that passing "feel good" laws such as a ban on high capacity magazines will make a real difference in "significantly decrease the chances for gun violence nationwide".

All he will accomplish is to cause every magazine with a capacity of more than 10 rounds to fly off the shelves at gun stores, gun shows and internet suppliers all over our nation. There's no chance that he could ever get a law passed that would require confiscation of these magazines and even if he did accomplish this, many gun owners would simply refuse to turn their magazines in.

Since any person with a little practice can swap magazines quickly and of course carry more than one firearm, a massacre can be accomplished with 10 round magazines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken_Fish Donating Member (520 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
18. Boy I bet if this is passed Camden and Irvington would go from shithole dumps
to crime free functional communities overnight. I mean, NJ is such a shining example of functional laws...

Will never leave committee anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tejas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
20. Lautenberg uses the Giffords canard (oh my, what a surprise)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC