Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"May-issue" gun laws are now vulnerable to court challenge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 11:34 AM
Original message
"May-issue" gun laws are now vulnerable to court challenge
As all nine Supreme Court justices ruled for incorporation of the Second Amendment in McDonald v. Chicago, any refusal to issue a permit to otherwise qualified individuals by a locality is now deprivation of civil rights under color of law.

So now, many cities in California, New York, and Massachusetts are now faced with the choice of abandoning the unlawful and corrupt practice
or defending it in court.

Good riddance, says I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Riftaxe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. It will be interesting to see what happens
in the areas that would only issue to the wealthy and politically connected up to this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. not necessarily
first off, only 6 really voted for incorporation (5 for a decently strong right and 1 for a bastardized shell of a right). The other 3 just tried to re-argue heller (im quite dissapointed in sotomayor; i thought she would have stuck with steven's mindset)

Second, right now, this ruling still really only applies in the home- my guess is that it will take a long time (and may not even happen) to turn NYC from a "may-issue" into a "shall issue" (with regards to a carry permit- i don't question that these places will be forced to issue permits for home possession in a shall issue manner)

My hope is as we go foward, this ruling well help entrench the heller ruling as law and make a challge towards it less likely to succeed. Remember, if the 3 dissentors got 2 more, not only would chicago still have their ban, but Heller would be defunct
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Of course it will take long time. Constitutional challenges always do.
People forget Heller was decided 7 years after Heller was denied a permit.

The point is there is a path towards showing may issue violates due process and equal protection under the law.

The 2nd is a right, it is a fundamental right and that protection applies equally to both States & Federal agents.

It might be a decade but a challenge will happen and it will go all the way to SCOTUS again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sailor65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. That's what I'm hoping.
Having lived in the "Shall Issue" state of Michigan for so long, I'm hoping to see New York moved away from the ridiculously arbitrary "May Issue" before I move back there later this year.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelly1mm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe there is hope for Maryland as well. If you do not have BIG
BUCKS don't even try to get a CWP here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC