PavePusher
(909 posts)
|
Tue Nov-03-09 10:14 PM
Original message |
 |
http://www.usatoday.com/news/snapshot.htm?section=N&lab... "be allowed to keep them"?!?!?! Gohd forbid I play Internet ToughGuy(tm), but just try to come and take them, you silly F#@*$.
|
eqfan592
(859 posts)
|
Tue Nov-03-09 10:32 PM
Response to Original message |
spin
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Nov-03-09 11:23 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Wow, after 10,000 votes, 79% say... |
 |
people who have guns for self protection should be allowed to keep them in home, car, and on person.
Only 8% say that people should not be allowed to gun.
|
proteus_lives
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 4. This poll and others like it make the grabbers look more like loons then usual. |
 |
The nation is sane on this issue.
|
krispos42
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:15 AM
Response to Original message |
 |
All part of the attempt to influence people on a subconsious level.
It's a right. "Allow" has nothing to do with it.
Jesus, can you imagine if they took a snapshot poll of letting, say, a minority group vote? Or of letting a religion be practiced?
|
AtheistCrusader
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 6. You'd probably get about the same 8% of bigots voting 'no'. |
old mark
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 8. Like they are allowing us free speech........There are a large number of |
 |
very stupid people in this country.
mark
|
proteus_lives
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:26 AM
Response to Original message |
 |
79%!
Does the grabber and anti-Rights crowd feel lonely yet?
|
JonQ
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Nov-04-09 02:41 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. That is an absurd phrasing for an established right |
 |
they would never present other rights that way.
|
PavePusher
(909 posts)
|
Thu Nov-05-09 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
 |
"Should people who own books for research be allowed to keep them?"
Only if you don't want to see my guns...
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Nov 23rd 2009, 11:28 PM
Response to Original message |