Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. most armed country with 90 guns per 100 people

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
beevul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:08 PM
Original message
U.S. most armed country with 90 guns per 100 people
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 08:15 PM by beevul
With all the Non-current numbers I have seen posted lately I thought this would be a good time to revisit how many guns there really are in America.


U.S. most armed country with 90 guns per 100 people
By Laura MacInnis

GENEVA (Reuters) - The United States has 90 guns for every 100 citizens, making it the most heavily armed society in the world, a report released on Tuesday said.

U.S. citizens own 270 million of the world's 875 million known firearms, according to the Small Arms Survey 2007 by the Geneva-based Graduate Institute of International Studies.

About 4.5 million of the 8 million new guns manufactured worldwide each year are purchased in the United States, it said.

"There is roughly one firearm for every seven people worldwide. Without the United States, though, this drops to about one firearm per 10 people," it said.

http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSL2834893820070828?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&rpc=22&sp=true



If gun ownership is really declining... all the guns formerly owned by now non-gun owners, and those 4.5 million NEW guns... where are they going?


Also, If anyone has more current figures, I'd love to see them.


Edited for spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well I've got 2 cannons so that lowers the neighborhood average.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Can't help with the current figures, sorry.
I have more than two long arms per household member here. Hope this helps.
My teenage son has three long guns mounted above his bed, in the rack his Father made in High School.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. We have 1 gun for eight people in our family.
That means somebody out there has eight guns just for himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idovoodoo Donating Member (365 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Between my SO and me, we have about 18
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Llewlladdwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. That would be me.
I kid, I kid. I actually only own a couple of Mosins (a 91/30 and an M44), a Mauser Kar98, a Walther P-38, a Jager AP-74 and a Ruger 10/22. I'd really like to pick up a Walther P-99 but I'll probably go with a Glock 27 or a Springfield XD (easier to CC). The Mosins always get noticed at the range (really loud and quite the muzzle flash) but the Mauser's probably my favorite. It's one heck of a well engineered firearm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WWFZD Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Go with the XD
or at least try one first. I love my XD-40. It fits my hand perfectly and I can put 10 rounds into a propane can from 10-15 yards as fast as I can pull the trigger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Llewlladdwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Thanks for the tip!
Do you have the sub-compact? That's the one I was considering as a carry gun. We've got a local range that rents pistols by the hour so I'll more than likely give one a try soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I was all "What the hell is it with all these guns?" and I realized what forum I'm in.
Let me try this again: I have 14 guns. I have an Uzi, five Lugars, a Gatling gun, an elephant rifle, countless handguns, and other stuff.

(Am I fitting in yet?) ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comradebillyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. no
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Gee. That sounded angry.
I'll leave now.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comradebillyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. not angry at all, it was just obvious that you
really had no interest in guns and didn't seem to know much about them. Just didn't seem like a wordy response was needed, certainly no offense intended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WWFZD Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #14
32. I have the 4" barrel
I believe they call that the compact now as opposed to the 3" barrel sub compact. They have hi-cap mags for the sub-compact that lengthen the grip to the compact length and capacity. The ergonomics of the XD are excellent, at least for me. It points like my finger, target reacquisition is easy, as fast as I can pull the trigger. It's not an HK or a SIG but it's a lot cheaper and reliable as anything out there. It's been put through the Glock torture tests and came out fine. I have one gripe, the finish is not very good on mine but you can pay a few extra bucks and get the stainless slide. I think they have improved the black finish since I bought mine 4 years ago.
Have fun trying one out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Llewlladdwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. Hoping to try one out this week.
I'm headed home today (been on a business trip) and I'm itching to get to the range.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comradebillyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. I have a Springfield XD 40 and I used to have a Glock 21
I personally like the Springfield better, but my favorite pistol is my S&W 1911 PD, but its only good for winter carry when I wear a jacket or long vest. For warm weather concealment I like the Sig P239 in .40S&W.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Llewlladdwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #19
33. Haven't looked at the Sig.
I'll add that to the review list though. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. That probably would be me. :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
postulater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. I have three, none of which have been fired in over 25 years.
I only have ammo for one and they all have trigger locks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stark6935 Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I have one
but I will probably end up with like 10. I have friends that probably have 50 for just themselves. I guess it just gets to be a collection, and some of them have cool history to them like ww2 guns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Llewlladdwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. "cool history" indeed.
I got my C&R FFL a couple of years ago and started collecting WWII-era smallarms at that time. I think it's given me a much greater appreciation of the technology and capabilities available to the different forces in that conflict. For example, the Mosin M44 is rugged as all get out but a nightmare to operate (recoil is horrid and the bolt is sticky as hell) while the action on the Mauser Kar98k is as smooth as can be. Imagining what actions my weapons may have been involoved in (no way to know, but maybe they were in some decisive battles) makes them even more interesting. Not a hobby for everyone, but it certainly makes me feel closer to the men involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
28. I have some empty field bandage cans
Imagine the human slant on how they were used in WWII.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L1A1Rocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. Yep, nothing like taking a weapon off of a dead kraut!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Llewlladdwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #28
34. The original sardine can-type for the Carlisle dressings?
Can you share how they came into your possession? I bet there's a heck of a story there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #34
43. I can share.....
I was stationed in the Phillipines in '65. I came to be friends with a Filipino family that had lived in the same house since the 1800s. The elder of the house had an attic FULL of war stuff he'd collected during WWII. He gave me some bandage tins as a gesture of friendship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #11
41. My C&R FFL is due for renewal
Thanks for the reminder!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #41
67. just got my C&R
yesterday, first time issuince, time to order me my enfield
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L1A1Rocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. WE'RE NUMBER 1, WE'RE NUMBER 1
Of course I've got around 20 myself. Guess I'm blowing the average hu?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1620rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I have enough....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WWFZD Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. Interesting
I have 6, but one of those is WW2 German officers FN .32. All the original markings, took off a dead Nazi, an heirloom locked away and never fired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. The number of gun owners isn't declining - just the PERCENTAGE of Americans. Some numbers..
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 09:42 PM by jmg257
There are consistently more gun owners every year.



According to the NORC organization, their were 65+ Million gun owners in 2006*, compared to the est. 57 Million gun owners in 2004**, which is atleast 6 million MORE then they estimated (51 Million**) owned them in 2000, compared to the est. 44 Million who owned them in 1997****.

*According to NORC 2006 National Gun Policy Survey of the National Opinion Research Center "the percentage of Americans who reported personally owning a gun has shrunk to just under 22 percent"
**2004 estimates of 26% of adults in the US owning at least
one firearm, Injury Prevention estimated that 57 million adults owned 283
million firearms
***Smith, “2001 National Gun Policy Survey of the National Opinion Research Center: Research
Findings.” (50.6 million individuals who personally own a gun – Applying 24.2% estimate of adult
gun owners to 2000 Census total of 209,128,904 adults).
****. Philip J. Cook and Jens Ludwig, “Guns in America: National Survey on Private Ownership and
Use of Firearms,”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boomer 50 Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Bear one thing in mind
The stats are concerned about "legal" guns produced by licensed manufacturers. When I had a compliance inspection a few years ago, the inspector had his supervisor out with him. His supervisor dropped a bomb on me when he stated that the BATFE estimates that for every 5 guns in the US that are "legal" there are between 3 and 4 that are considered contraband. Out of that number, they estimate that almost a third are contraband NFA items such as machineguns, silencers, short barreled rifles or shotguns, etc. They also have absolutely no idea how many home made legally compliant guns without any information on them may be in circulation at the present time. The 1994 AW ban had the predicted side effect of a major increase in parts kit conversions on "garage" receivers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L1A1Rocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Wow, interesting stuff there.
Question: Would old war trophies, ie bring backs be considered legal but w/o paperwork?

They estimates on the contraband NFA stuff is probably correct. I know lots of people did not register under the amnesty in 86 because they thought it was a trick and their stuff would be confiscated. It also underscores the need for another amnesty period as proscribed in the 86 law.

Also, their assertion of legal homemade "garage" firearms is correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comradebillyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. What's legal depends on what state you live in. The WWII
rifles and pistols that are not full auto, are considered to be "curios and relics" by the federal govt. Some of those curios and relics are very good semi-automatic assault weapons, like the Russian SKS. If I had a federal Class III firearms license, I could legally buy certain types of automatic weapons like WWII vintage machine guns or silenced pistols. When I was at my gun club shooting last week the people next to my group were shooting a FAL full auto assault rifle (a modern NATO assault rifle). 2 problems with full auto, one-you spend more time loading the damn thing than you do shooting it, second-you spend a fortune buying ammunition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stark6935 Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I actually almost bought,
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 11:03 PM by stark6935
a mosinagant yesterday (150$), but I don't really know what I want now. I actually looked for a Kar98k, but I don't think I have actually ever seen one for sale. I might just buy a Garand, but who knows. I would love to have an MG42, but...I don't have 7 grand for a gun lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comradebillyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. A couple of my friends have Mosin-Nagant's
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 12:11 AM by comradebillyboy
They are actually good rifles for the money and reasonably accurate. Relatively cheap ammo is available as well. I am thinking of going in the other direction and getting a civil war replica 1861 Springfield cap and ball rifled musket. One of my shooting buddies casts his own .58 caliber Minnett Balls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virginia mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #25
36. I collect WWII weaponry..
I have rifles and pistols from the following nations..

United States, M1 Garand (Springfield Amory), and Carbines, 1911 A1 (US Switch and Signal)
Soviet Union, Several different modals of Mosin Nagants (Tula and Iveshek Mfr)
Germany K98k Mauser, P38
Finland, "Kivaari M91-24" w/Sig Sauer Heavy Barrel (SAKO Assembly), {SA} marked Mosin M91
Japan Type 99 Short Rifle (Nagoya Arsenal, 4th series), in 7.7 Jap
England, No 1 Mk III* Lee Enfields, No 4 Mk1 Lee Enfields, {various mfr)
Canada, No4 Mk2* Lee Enfield (Long Branch), Inglis/Browning Hi PowerMk1 Pistol.
Australia and New Zealand, No1 MkIII* Lee Enfield (Lithgow Mfr)

This morning, I am looking to close the deal on another German K98k.


I have most of the main combatants, main "battle rifles" in my collection, now I Need to find me a Italian Carcano, and a French M36, to round off my collection.

I also have a few more modern military type rifles, but since we are talking about WWII, I left them out of the post. These rifles are a very tangible link to our history, we would be remiss if we, as a people forgot about the valiant people that carried many of these arms into combat, or the shear terror the "previous" government approved, possessor of these weapons caused to the innocent.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elmer1007 Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. MG 42
The last registered MG 42 I saw sold went for $65,000. plus tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ac2007 Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #26
38. I think he was referring to the semi-auto version
Semi-auto MG42s go for around $7K with full accessories (era tripod, ammo belts, original data plates and the like). Gun alone runs around $6000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
27. It looks like the numbers of gun owners is down slightly...
... but the average guns per owner is up.

Keep in mind that the population of the US goes up by like 4 million per year net, so we're actually ahead of the curve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnbraun Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #27
54. "Hi! I'm from the government and I'm doing a survey! How many guns do you own?"
Anyone want to venture how likely it was that gun owners answered "Zero"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #54
58. "I used to own a Ruger 10/22 and a Smith & Wesson .38 Special..."
"...But I lost them in a tragic boating accident."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L1A1Rocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #54
60. Geee Mr G. Man
I ain't got none of them therr ferrarrrms. Not one, no sirrey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
29. What if...
By some decree - we were forced to use the term "Death Tool" instead of "Gun" when referring to these items? That's all they are. They weren't invented because there was a plague of targets that threatened to smother humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L1A1Rocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. But what if
We called them life savers. In honor of all the Innocent lives saved by their proper use! Yea, what a great idea you had. A new an more descriptive euphemism. THE LIFE SAVER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #29
37. So? I would own 20 "death tools" instead of 20 "guns"? Who cares?
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 08:35 AM by jmg257
Wouldn't change that they ARE indeed just "tools". But then again - anything is a "dangerous instrument" depending on how it is used - cars, axes, chain saws, 2x4s, matches, etc. We could call cars "death tools" too since they kill so many more people every year - and they weren't even designed to do so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #37
45. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Not as dumb an argument as changing the name of an object to try to justify infringing basic rights.
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 01:45 PM by jmg257
Parsing doesn't help, and neither does cracking yourself up over your stupid ideas; this re-labeling of yours is even worse then the idea of trying to rely on stats to infringe on natural rights. We saw enough of this idiocy with the whole "assault weapon" farce.

If most guns weren't designed to "end life", they wouldn't be so effective at sending out little pieces of metal at such high speeds. They wouldn't be as effective for self-defense, common defense, law enforcement, hunting, target shooting, etc. They also wouldn't be as fun to use, wouldn't have the history they have, etc. But no matter what you want to call them - guns, arms, firearms, or even "death tools" - the fact is we would still own them, and still have the right to do so.

:) Now THAT is worth smiling about! :toast:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Me neither. Bush WOULD be SO proud of you since you are SO willing to restrict rights for illusions
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 02:22 PM by jmg257
of safety.

The Patriot Act must make you crack up too!...Laughing your ass off over Gitmo? Waterboarding? FISA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #49
61. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #61
77. Figured such a vision would give you a laugh - the more your boy gets the better, huh? The thought
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 08:51 PM by jmg257
of more tyranny amuses you, I know - I get it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EricTeri Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. There are MANY of us who support the 2nd Amendment n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L1A1Rocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. Do you have anything to add other
than barbs/insults? If not the exit is that way ------------>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. Ahh Heston..."Get your stinking paws off my gun, you damn dirty ape!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L1A1Rocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. HaHaHaHa!!! LMAO!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #52
57. "Is that a pistol in your pocket or are you just glad to see me?" Mae West
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #48
55. This was posted in General Discussion a while back...




Nationwide, about half of U.S. gun owners are Dems and indies. We own guns, and we're keeping them.


----------------------
The Conservative Roots of U.S. Gun Control

Dems and the Gun Issue - Now What? (written in '04, largely vindicated in '06, IMO)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnbraun Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #48
59. Why are you being so intolerant of those that make different life choices than you?
Liberals shouldn't act in such a divisive and bigoted manner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #48
63. You don't know the Democratic Party says "We will protect Americans' Second Amendment right
to own firearms"?

Have you considered joining a political party that wants to ban guns?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #63
71. What's the name and strength
of your "militia"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #71
73. Not sure, but his is probably the same as ours: "we the people". Strength of approx 300 million.
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 08:48 PM by jmg257
"we the people" being in the Constitutional sense..the people of the United States &c.

Ya know, those for who such absolute rights are secured by the Law of the Land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #71
75. The militia is defined in 10 USC 311 and may include additional people based on state constitutions.
10 USC 311

Thanks for asking. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #75
78. IF you wanted to rely on the militia observation, that is true. Although secures
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 08:57 PM by jmg257
our right to military arms, I like the self-defense & private use aspect too - allows me to CCW and get all kinds of other good stuff.


Public Law 109-92
109th Congress

An Act

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act''.

SEC. 2. <<NOTE: 15 USC 7901.>> FINDINGS; PURPOSES.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution
provides that the right of the people to keep and bear arms
shall not be infringed.
(2) The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution
protects the rights of individuals, including those who are not
members of a militia or engaged in military service or training,
to keep and bear arms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #78
80. I agree re RKBA but the question was a diversion from #45 which referred to "freeper corner in DU".
I was just educating a gun-grabber who obviously doesn't know that the Democratic Party supports RKBA and none of the background for RKBA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #80
81. Understood! Cheers! Ok debate is on - have to go watch Obama kick butt!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L1A1Rocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #71
82. I believe you need to expand your education
on what the Militia is, every able bodied male.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #82
83. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
L1A1Rocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #83
84. I believe you ment "life saver"
At lease that's what mine are for. Cannot speak for you of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L1A1Rocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #83
85. Thank you for admitting that
you really do know what the definition of militia is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #83
90. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #90
92. It's really terrible, eh?
Funny that's such is a regular feature on the Comedy Channel, where such extremisim is mocked for the lunacy it really is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L1A1Rocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #92
96. You do realize
that you just used skits on the comedy channel to back up your assertions right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EricTeri Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #92
116. Using the Comedy Channel as support for your position?
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 07:25 PM by EricTeri
Says quite a bit about you and your mentality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #83
91. Sorry some states, e.g. Louisiana, include females in the militia and the age to 64.
RS 29:3

§3. Militia

A. All able-bodied persons between the ages of seventeen and sixty-four residing in this state and who are not exempt by the laws of the United States of America or of this state constitute the militia of Louisiana and are subject to military duty.

B. The militia is divided into two classes, the organized militia and the unorganized militia.

(1) The organized militia consists of the national guard, the Louisiana State Guard and other organized military forces which may be authorized by law.

(2) The unorganized militia consists of all other persons subject to military duty.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #91
93. Wall Shoot Haudee!
How's come you ain't petitionin' the guvamints for some free ammo! Seems that's the LEAST they could do for the "reserves". :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #93
94. The issue was your ignorance of certain facts that I have demonstrated. Have a good day. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L1A1Rocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #94
98. Hey Jody
take a look at Article 1 Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution. What he says in jest just might be in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #98
107. I'm familiar with Article I, Section 8, Clauses 15 & 16. Neither of them define the militia but it
is defined in 10 USC 311 and by states in their statues.

I cited Louisiana law that says in RS 29:3
§3. Militia

A. All able-bodied persons between the ages of seventeen and sixty-four residing in this state and who are not exempt by the laws of the United States of America or of this state constitute the militia of Louisiana and are subject to military duty.

B. The militia is divided into two classes, the organized militia and the unorganized militia.

(1) The organized militia consists of the national guard, the Louisiana State Guard and other organized military forces which may be authorized by law.

(2) The unorganized militia consists of all other persons subject to military duty.


My citation was sufficient to refute the assertion in #83 that the militia included only males 17 to 45. That statement is true only under 10 USC 311 but not true for all states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L1A1Rocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #107
109. My reference
was actually a response to Pluckateer's comment he made in jest about the Feds giving out ammo. I have herd several people that Article 1 Section 8 implies just that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #109
110. Mea culpa. I agree with you that Clause 16, Section 8, Article I requires Congress
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 05:37 PM by jody
"To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia".

That includes both the "organized" and "unorganized" militia as defined in 10 USC 311.

Congress uses that authority to provide token funds for various state "unorganized militias" that vary quite widely from state to state.

One place to get acquainted with state unorganized militias is State Organizations, State Guard Association of the United States, Inc.

ON EDIT ADD:
I believe Senators Kerry and Kennedy voted to eliminate the Civilian Marksmanship Program that was established to partially fulfill congress's responsibility to organize, arm, and discipline the unorganized militia. (Vote No. 325 Oct. 12, 1993; Vote No. 178, June 27, 19)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L1A1Rocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #93
97. Are you referring to Article 1 Section 8
of the US constitution? I agree, congress IS supposed to be giving ammo to the civilians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #97
111. Well what's wrong with you then???
Why aren't you gettin' yur share and sprayin' metal with abandon??? Gotta keep sharp, ya know! Never know when that first wave of camel calvalry will crest the hill! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L1A1Rocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #111
112. Who's to say
that I already have enough to last quite some time. I am curious though, about the "camel calvalry" remark. Surly you are not disparaging an ethnic group are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L1A1Rocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #111
113. So you agree with that interpretation of Article 1 Section 8?
Not really sure as you didn't respond to it. You only wanted to make a swipe at me and anyone that rides a camel. Shame shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #113
120. OH yeah....
I'm just MELTING with shame here. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L1A1Rocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #120
121. Thank you for your agreement.
It is nice to be able to meet in these forums to educate the uninformed. Most people are too closed minded on the gun issue to accept evidence contrary to their pre-conceived ideas. Congratulations on broadening your horizons.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L1A1Rocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #111
114. I notice you have a lot of posts deleted.
Is that maybe do to remarks similar in nature you make disparaging anyone that rides a camel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #111
115. Now your talking! Our bristling arsenal of course includes copious amounts of ammo!
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 07:11 PM by jmg257
Range time is a given too. You have to take the self-responsibility seriously - luck is all well and good, but a little talent will ALWAYS help!

Besides - shooting is such a blast! (shooting is a blast - get it? :rofl:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #111
117. Dude, that's "cavalry."
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 09:00 PM by benEzra
Wall Shoot Haudee! How's come you ain't petitionin' the guvamints for some free ammo! Seems that's the LEAST they could do for the "reserves".

...

Well what's wrong with you then??? Why aren't you gettin' yur share and sprayin' metal with abandon??? Gotta keep sharp, ya know! Never know when that first wave of camel calvalry will crest the hill!

Dude, that's "cavalry." Cavalry is light mounted infantry; calvary is an Anglicized Latin name for a hill in Jerusalem. If you're going to fling accusations of hickhood and stupidity, at least learn to spell.




----------------------
Thoughts on Gun Ownership

Dems and the Gun Issue - Now What? (written in '04, largely vindicated in '06, IMO)

The Conservative Roots of U.S. Gun Control
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #117
119. 'scuze me, Ez....
Did they not use camels in that geographic area at one time? I rest your case.

First rule of industry: You must be smarter than the tools you employ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #93
102. Same as with guns - the people must supply their own. THAT way the govt can't withhold those
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 04:33 PM by jmg257
arms and accoutrements in order to disarm the people in violation of the constitution. Which of course is a primary reason for the 2nd amendment. It is a big problem now with the organized militia of the United States (federal NG), it would be little help to oppose tyranny since the state holds the keys to the arms. Even Hamilton, who preferred a select militia, didn't want that militia to depend on the govt for it source of arms.

No one in their right mind would depend on the govt to keep us armed. The framers didn't - they specifically wrote laws against it, and neither should we - as can be seen - they don't do a very good job with the duties with regards to the people they DO have.


Jeremiah Wadsworth of Connecticut: "Is there a man in this House who would wish to see so large a proportion of the community, perhaps one-third, armed by the United States, and liable to be disarmed by them?" "Masters would assist apprentices, and as to minors, their parents or guardians would prefer furnishing them with arms themselves, to depending on the United States when they knew they were liable to having them reclaimed."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #47
72. Well - here's hoping
you're not on the receiving end of someone else's 2nd Am. rights some time. Nothin' like bein' on the receiving end to make you think again.

OH YES - I know - I know, that won't happen becuase YOU will dissuade such aggression with your bristling arsenal. Yeah - sure. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #72
76. Oh it could happen - nothing guaranteed except the right itself. Figure my odds are definitely
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 08:49 PM by jmg257
better armed then unarmed - something about being a helpless victim isn't so attractive.

Great thing about choice - you can choose to be unarmed, and I can choose to be armed - even with a "bristling arsenal". Ahhh - freedom!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L1A1Rocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #72
86. A bristling arsenal
is probably a tad better then your . . . um. . . . harsh words. Yeah, that'll do the trick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #47
99. Ah ah ah....
"deadly assault weapons" is the term now. Plain old "assault weapons" lost its zing, apparantly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #29
39. That would violate the First Amendment
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EricTeri Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #29
42. What if
People who insisted upon trying to tell others what to do because they were scared of what someone MIGHT do were legally allowed to be hunted down like rabid dogs? You think that might alter your perception about what was your business and what isn't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. Not at all
There's what's right (er Right) and what isn't. I'd rather die for what's right than what isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EricTeri Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. I feel much the same way
And it is MY right to be armed if i so choose.

You can laugh it off or attempt to redefine firearms however you choose, but the bottom line is, my rights are my rights. How you feel about them is largely irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #44
56. whats right in this case
is an oppinion. For you to claim that you hold the absolute truth on whats right and wrong is dillusional at best. may this be a warning to you that next time you jump on your high horse- make sure that someone doesnt knock you down :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #56
62. Private citizens with guns
are either cowards or bullies. And lest you folks start to surmize silly conclusions - I carried an M-16 to war. Tools of death - that's all they are. Justify them however you like - just let your thinking free from the narrow corridor you keep it confined to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sergeiAK Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #62
64. Ad Hominem writ large. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virginia mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #62
65. LOL WOW...
Please back up that statement.....

Only a coward would make a statement that he can't back up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fightthegoodfightnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #65
74. Back What Up
Cowardly? What part of that makes someone you 'brave'?

Bravery has nothing do to with a gun and everything to do with a man's character.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L1A1Rocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #74
79. It's baaaaaccckkkkk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrCory Donating Member (862 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #74
106. Do you question the character of the Warsaw Ghetto uprisers? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #62
66. obviously you had a different experience than i did
but that doesnt make your position correct and mine incorrect- or vice versa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #62
68. Oh, so the fact that you served in a war makes you an expert
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex1775 Donating Member (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #62
69. I carried an M-4 carbine into war.
Got the medals to prove it.

I love knowing that private citizens in America are allowed to be armed. I saw too many 3rd world hell holes where the local cops/army units/whatever you want to call them, took what they wanted, when they wanted to, because Joe Sixpack had no recourse to stop them. Same thing went for the criminals. Thanks... but no thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal4truth Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:57 AM
Response to Reply #69
87. Go ahead and try to stop the cops when they come to take your guns away.....
.....that should make for a great show on "COPS" !!

Guns are for killing people. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #87
89. Ahh.. "cops coming to take our guns away" - enforcing unconstitutional laws. Yay Tyranny!
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 08:18 AM by jmg257
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex1775 Donating Member (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #89
100. And the same people are in marches on the local news...
Claiming how Bush is turning America into a police state. Amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal4truth Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #100
118. The "same people"? Sounds like very bigotted statement to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrCory Donating Member (862 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #87
105. Resistance...
Against tyranny is heroic in of itself, regardless of the outcome. To not resist is enabling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #62
70. No bully here - I'm a real chicken shit. The more guns I have the better I feel.
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 08:59 PM by jmg257
I try to have 1 on me whenever I can - that way I don't have to be afraid of NOT having one when I need it.

Shit - I carried 2 on duty because I was scared I might need a back-up. Lots of ammo too. I couldn't switch to the .40 from the 9 fast enough since I was worried the 9mm wouldn't be as effective. Oh and the 870 was a nice bonus.

We rode alone alot.

The FBI shoot-out really bothered me, as did a particular incident with cops getting murdered in NYC, and a State trooper getting killed in a shootout (RIP Troop Aversa) - I knew I didn't want to get caught ill-prepared like those poor guys did. (or caught with a less-effective 9mm). Something about watching the crying widow and her kids in a funeral procession has a way of getting to you.
I must admit I teared up when the band played taps and Amazing Grace too.


I do have to admit that shooting the M16, M4 and M249 are a real blast! No fear there...just total enjoyment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal4truth Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:57 AM
Response to Reply #62
88. Amen!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #88
95. Amen is right! Nothing wrong with a little fear..keeps one from doing ALOT of stupid things, like
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 12:19 PM by jmg257
not taking on the self-responsibility of being armed, not relying on others for your safety, not replacing batteries in fire alarms, not wearing your seatbelts, not counting on the good-will(??) of the bad guy or 911 to save you, not growing a pair and overcoming any ineptness you might have, not putting fences around your pool, not teaching your kids about matches, etc. etc. etc.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EricTeri Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #62
101. Interesting thought process you have there...
So because I choose to exercise my rights, and do not depend upon someone else for my safety, I am a coward or a bully.

Meanwhile, someone like you who expects another to put his life at risk to ensure your safety - even though that other person has neither legal or moral obligation to do so, and is willing to attempt to use the full force of government to force people like me to do what YOU want to do, is somehow NOT cowardly and is NOT bullying?

Ignorance is strength, eh comrade?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
40. Good question about where those 4.5 million go
My collection of more than 50 makes me a significant contributor to the per-capita figure, but nearly all of mine were made before or during World War II.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemOkie Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #40
103. Slackmaster, I think I'm reponsible
Well, my wife and I. I think we're well past 70. I just can't bring myself to stop her from shopping.:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #103
104. Your wife rocks! Mine "allows" it, but begrudgingly (I still do Ok though!)
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 04:36 PM by jmg257
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemOkie Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #104
108. JMG
I don't really have a choice. Our gameroom is really just there to showcase all of her shooting trophies. To be entitled to my little corner I am compelled to let her buy guns. Such is life...;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC