Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PUC cites energy program savings (Maine)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 02:03 PM
Original message
PUC cites energy program savings (Maine)
http://pressherald.mainetoday.com/news/state/070202energy.html

AUGUSTA - A state program that encourages energy efficiencies such as better light fixtures saved Mainers the equivalent of the annual electricity needs of nearly 11,000 homes last year, the Public Utilities Commission said.

The Efficiency Maine program reduced electricity use by more than 74 million kilowatt hours in 2006, helping to avert the production of more than 320,000 tons of carbon dioxide, a major pollutant contributing to global warming, the report said.

The program's effect on reducing carbon pollution was the equivalent of taking 7,624 cars off the road or serving the electrical needs of 11,000 homes, the PUC said.

<snip>

The report, which was presented last week to the Legislature, includes some energy-saving examples. It says lighting upgrades at B&M Baked Beans last year saved the Portland company $135,590.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
amitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. For the life of me, I don't understand why more people don't use energy efficient lighting
I've been using it since the damn things were ten bucks a pop. And now, they're so inexpensive, and they are way better in terms of light quality than they were in the old days.

Who doesn't like the idea of not having to get up on the ladder to change out the damned overhead bulb so doggone often?

An old fashioned bulb is perhaps useful if you have an old cat who likes to bask under a bulb for the heat, but beyond that, I prefer the newer technologies.

Good for Maine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. That is OBVIOUSLY a lie. Unka Dick said we couldn't conserve our
way out of energy woes.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC