Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ten Reasons Why Climate Change May Be More Severe than Projected

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 10:59 PM
Original message
Ten Reasons Why Climate Change May Be More Severe than Projected
Edited on Thu Jan-04-07 11:03 PM by RedEarth
Australian climate scientist Barry Pittock gave a terrific and terrifying talk at the 20th Anniversary of the Climate Insitute last week. He made the case that the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the key international process for determining the “consensus” view on climate, is systematically underestimating the future impacts of climate change. Since Pittock was a major contributor to the IPCC’s Third Assessment Report (2001) and since their Fourth Assessment is due out next year, we should pay attention to what he says.

1. “The climate sensitivity, or global warming after a doubling of the pre-industrial carbon dioxide concentration, is probably in the range of 2º–6°C rather than the 2001 IPCC estimate of 1.5º–4.5ºC. This suggests a more than 50% chance of that global warming by 2100 will be 3ºC or more, a level that many consider dangerous.”

3. “Permafrost melting is widespread,” which “leads to emissions of carbon dioxide and methane,” a dangerous vicious climate cycle that CP has written about.

7. & 8. “Rapid changes in Antarctica” and “Rapid melting and faster outlet glaciers in Greenland,” which combine to threaten far faster and greater sea level rise than climate models have been predicting.

I found his talk very compelling as it matched what I’ve been hearing from a number of climate scientists I interviewed for my book, including James Hansen. Pittock concludes:

The above lines of evidence (supported by well over 100 recent scientific papers), while not definitive and in some cases controversial, suggest that the balance of evidence may be swinging toward a more extreme outcome. While some of the observations may be due merely to natural fluctuations, their conjunction and, in several cases, amplifying effects are causes for concern. They suggest that critical levels of global warming may occur at even lower greenhouse gas concentrations and emissions than was considered justified in the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report issued in 2001.

In short, the time for inaction has run out.

http://climateprogress.org/2006/09/25/ten-reasons-why-climate-change-may-be-more-severe-than-projected/

.........and Dr. A. Barrie Pittock........

Scientific Symposium Presentation Abstracts
September 19
Dr. A. Barrie Pittock: Ten Reasons Why Climate Change May Be More Severe than Projected*
Uncertainties in climate change science are inevitably large, due both to inadequate scientific understanding and to uncertainties in future human behavior. Policies therefore must be based on risk management, that is, on consideration of the probability times the magnitude of any deleterious outcomes for different scenarios of human behavior. In this talk I want to focus on observations and modeling studies in the last year or two in ten areas of concern, which when taken together strongly suggest that the risk of more serious outcomes is greater than was understood previously.

1. The climate sensitivity, or global warming after a doubling of the pre-industrial carbon dioxide concentration, is probably in the range of 2º–6°C rather than the 2001 IPCC estimate of 1.5º–4.5ºC. This suggests a more than 50% chance of that global warming by 2100 will be 3ºC or more, a level that many consider dangerous.

2. Global dimming is large but decreasing. Reductions of sunlight at the Earth’s surface by atmospheric pollution particles are diminishing as particulate emissions are brought more under control, thus decreasing their cooling effect and making the warming effect of greenhouse gases more evident.

3. Permafrost melting is widespread. Observations show rapid melting of permafrost (i.e., frozen ground). This tends to reduce the reflectivity of the surface to sunlight and, as vegetable matter in the soil starts to decay, leads to emissions of carbon dioxide and methane. These changes will enhance global warming.

http://washington_summit.climate.org/abstracts/pittock_tenreasons.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm more worried now than I ever have been and
I've been worried for a couple of decades

.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Please cross-post this in GD
Edited on Thu Jan-04-07 11:03 PM by JeffR
It's extremely important that as many people as possible here read this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Okay, it is true more people will see it.......
Edited on Thu Jan-04-07 11:11 PM by RedEarth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jcrew2001 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. inevitable
I think things will be exactly like the Day after Tomorrow - it will be too late, and we're all going to die.

So smoke em if you got em, hahha.

I doubt that anything can stop or prevent climate change unless there are serious Laws put in place. It won't be enough just to change individual habits.

We need LAWs to stop corporations/industries from toxic waste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. 10. "...A significant slowing...
...of the North Atlantic circulation that is in part powered by the sinking of dense, high salinity surface water has been reported."

If these reports are correct this is the likely death knell for global climate stability -- the precursor to a new ice age.

Scary shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kickysnana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Discover Magazine says transition to Ice Age was less than 10 years n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Most climatology experts seem to think...
...this transition is fast. How ironic that the problem we call global WARMING will ultimately usher in a new ice age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC