Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TheStreet.com - 2007 In Energy - "Fundamental Supply Challenges Remain"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 09:40 PM
Original message
TheStreet.com - 2007 In Energy - "Fundamental Supply Challenges Remain"
EDIT

Although many pundits point to signs of high inventories, the global crude oil and North American natural gas markets are still near the long-term supply-demand equilibrium.

Moreover, fundamental supply challenges remain. On the oil front, the Saudis are still seeing declines in their legacy oil-production fields, and Mexico's prize Cantarell oil field has peaked and is declining quickly. While there have been some appealing deep-water discoveries, such as the one in the Gulf of Mexico made by Chevron (CVX - commentary - Cramer's Take - Rating), meaningful production is years away and will cost hundreds of millions of dollars to develop.

While natural gas remains largely a regional market, its supply fundamentals are just as challenged as crude oil. Production decline rates in existing wells average about 30%, which means drilling must be done more quickly just to remain at break-even. A growing rig count could have little impact on overall production.

In addition, geopolitical risks -- such as instability in the Middle East, violence in Nigeria and political unrest in Venezuela -- have not substantially improved in the past 12 months. The potential still exists for price spikes due to political disruption in the coming year.

EDIT

http://www.thestreet.com/_tscrss/markets/activetraderupdate/10329273.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. 2031, or about 25 more years left...
We've got till 2031

according to Plan B 2.0

http://www.earth-policy.org/Books/PB2/PB2ch1_ss3.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's not what I read
I believe the article claims currect expansion of the both chinese and American economies won't happen that way models are projecting. The last paragraph says it all:

The inevitable conclusion to be drawn from these projections is that there are not enough resources for China to reach U.S. consumption levels. The western economic model—the fossil-fuel-based, automobile-centered, throwaway economy—will not work for China’s 1.45 billion in 2031. If it does not work for China, it will not work for India either, which by 2031 is projected to have even more people than China. Nor will it work for the other 3 billion people in developing countries who are also dreaming the “American dream.” And in an increasingly integrated world economy, where countries everywhere are competing for the same resources—the same oil, grain, and iron ore—the existing economic model will not work for industrial countries either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. We have NO time left
We have badly overshot our last several last chances to avoid, shall I say, "problems". I do not think that there is anything that can be done to avoid some kind of economic/social disruption, short of an energy discovery on the order of DIY super-duper cold hyper-orgone nanofusion with hot fudge, walnuts, and triple sprinkles. We may be able to avoid a population die-off, but even that will be difficult, and it's going to be absurd to persuade millions of dispossessed and angry people to save the four or five billion other people who never had much of anything to begin with.

Yes, I may crack wise, but I am not getting any pleasure out of it. I am sincerely frightened at the prospect of what will happen when the financial markets become aware of the situation. A few more oil field failures (both the Ghawar in S.A. and the Cantarell in Mexico are in collapse) and the energy market will either be thrown into a panic, or there will be a quick, if non-panicky, run-up of energy futures, and the entire economic system will change -- fast. This will not wait until 2031; it could happen as early as this coming year, though I think we do have a few more years.

The question is: "a few more years" for what?

We would need 1000 nuclear reactors, or 2,000,000 wind power plants, or 50 billion baked-bean suppers, just to buy us a little more time, a decade or so. We won't get that, either. It would take an effort on the scale of fighting WW2, and we'll only discover the will to do it in the middle of the crisis, when it's too late. We needed to make plans on this scale yesterday. And remember, the Boy King doesn't like "thinkers and planners".

We blew it. Sure, we should keep trying anyway, just in case we've overlooked some way to save our collective hide. But the future is not rosy. Deepen that rose color to the color of blood. That's more like it.

America will probably not starve. Probably. (Bush certainly won't.) But much of Europe, Japan, and developed South America will. Most of China. And all of everywhere else.

If the living come to envy the dead, the rich survivors will whine incessantly and poetically, and still steal the property the dead leave behind.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC