Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Space Sunshade Might Be Feasible In Global Warming Emergency

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
smb Donating Member (761 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 08:48 AM
Original message
Space Sunshade Might Be Feasible In Global Warming Emergency
Space Sunshade Might Be Feasible In Global Warming Emergency

... Angel, a University of Arizona Regents' Professor and one of the world's foremost minds in modern optics, directs the Steward Observatory Mirror Laboratory and the Center for Astronomical Adaptive Optics. He has won top honors for his many extraordinary conceptual ideas that have become practical engineering solutions for astronomy.

For the past year, Angel has been looking at ways to cool the Earth in an emergency. He's been studying the practicality of deploying a space sunshade in a global warming crisis, a crisis where it becomes clear that Earth is unmistakably headed for disastrous climate change within a decade or two.

Angel presented the idea at the National Academy of Sciences in April and won a NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts grant for further research in July. His collaborators on the grant are David Miller of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Nick Woolf of UA's Steward Observatory, and NASA Ames Research Center Director S. Pete Worden.

Angel is now publishing a first detailed, scholarly paper, "Feasibility of cooling the Earth with a cloud of small spacecraft near L1," in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The plan would be to launch a constellation of trillions of small free-flying spacecraft a million miles above Earth into an orbit aligned with the sun, called the L-1 orbit.

The spacecraft would form a long, cylindrical cloud with a diameter about half that of Earth, and about 10 times longer. About 10 percent of the sunlight passing through the 60,000-mile length of the cloud, pointing lengthwise between the Earth and the sun, would be diverted away from our planet. The effect would be to uniformly reduce sunlight by about 2 percent over the entire planet, enough to balance the heating of a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Crisis? What crisis?
A big umbrella is the solution? Yikes.



.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds like a band-aid solution
Intriguing, though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. Never mind the feasibility
of manufacturing, then launching, "trillions" of small spacecraft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. We'll put them up there with our flying cars, of course!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is what I would expect from people
who think of technology as a band-aid - instead of looking at meaningful long-term and short term actions and solutions.

It's been band-aid technological solutions without concern for consequences that has us in this mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Just for the exercise, I'm going to play devil's advocate.
Suppose this guy has a practical and affordable plan for putting a trillion light-scattering pico-sats in orbit (I'll have to read the paper. Resistance is futile). Suppose that we can afford this plan, and also afford to establish a carbon-neutral civilization. I'm unconvinced that we can afford either, but we're all going to find out soon enough. Anyway, suppose we can. The anticipated lag-time between an actual CO2 emissions reduction and the response from the atmosphere seems to be weighing in at 50 to 100 years. In a scenrio where we obtain a CO2 neutral economy, but have to deal with a response lag of 100 years, is a scenario where a band-aid would actually come in handy. Stop the bleeding until we can repair the artery, as it were.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. And I will play devils advocate to your devils advocate...
Suppose we do deploy this hugely expensive band-aid. And suppose it works wonderfully.

But also suppose that, oh say, 20 years from now, it develops a problem and since the earth's population was living on borrowed time, suddenly has to deal with global warming quite suddenly instead over several years to actually fix the problem?

The global shade is perfectly ridiculous idea. The amount of money that it would take to develop, deploy and maintain such a thing could be used instead to develop solar and other alternative technologies to ween us off fossil fuels. Instead of blocking a source of free energy, we should be doing our best to exploit it.

The solar shade is a band-aid on a broken arm. Once it's up there, do you honestly believe people will suddenly act responsible???? Heck no, proof is in the sales of SUV's. When the price of gas went up, people were screaming for fuel efficient alternative powered cars. Since the price of gas has dropped, no more demand and the SUV's are once again selling at a brisk pace.

People(in general)don't learn. People don't care. People don't want to do the hard work anymore. People just want their plastic fun box to watch. People will die because of their stupidity.

Until death comes knocking on their doors, people will continue to eat twinkies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC