Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New EPA Study - No Mercury Falls On VT - Researchers Show Otherwise

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 12:53 PM
Original message
New EPA Study - No Mercury Falls On VT - Researchers Show Otherwise
UNDERHILL, Vt. --Environmental Protection Agency computer models, developed as the federal agency prepared emission rules for coal-fired power plants, showed that no mercury from their stacks would fall on Vermont.

But it does, say scientists working at the Proctor Maple Research Center in Underhill. Eric Miller of the Norwich-based Ecosystems Research Group, who has been collecting the data, said it shows that spikes in airborne mercury in Vermont follow periods of hours or days in which air stagnates over a coal-fired power plant in Ohio or Pennsylvania. The EPA computer models "show a zero for the effect of power plants on mercury deposition in Vermont," Miller said last week. "Their model world doesn't jibe with the real world we are measuring."

Miller's findings could help Vermont and other states that are pushing for tougher mercury controls on power plants. They have long maintained that prevailing west winds make New England the tail pipe to emissions from inland parts of the country. Mercury shows up as toxic methylmercury in the tissues of fish including walleye, lake trout and smallmouth bass. But if ingested by humans, especially fetuses and small children, it can cause neurological damage. That's why the state Health Department urges that pregnant women and young children sharply limit their intake of many types of fish, and eat no walleye or large lake trout at all.

Miller said the biggest jump in airborne mercury during his sampling was Aug. 31, 2005, when air that was over Vermont had spent the previous days stalled near coal-fired power plants in Pennsylvania. The EPA has justified its reading of the science by maintaining that much of the airborne mercury it hears complaints about comes from China and other sources outside the United States.

EDIT

http://www.boston.com/news/local/vermont/articles/2006/...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Darn those facts! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 16th 2014, 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC