Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rick Santorum Scores 100% On US Chamber's Environmental Scorecard

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 01:50 PM
Original message
Rick Santorum Scores 100% On US Chamber's Environmental Scorecard
Hey, it's not a surprise, but . . .

Environmental groups say U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum is a complete zero when it comes to protecting the environment. They point to his votes to allow drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico, and against tougher pollution control rules, among others. Mr. Santorum, a Republican who scored 100 percent on six environmental issues with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said liberal groups like the Sierra Club and League of Conservation Voters cherry-pick issues that help them raise money and ignore practical solutions hes supported to address Pennsylvanias environmental woes. They include fighting for money to repair coal-mine scarring and preserve farms. What Ive tried to do is deliver, not just talk, but deliver for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Mr. Santorum told a Pennsylvania Environmental Council forum in June.

His opponent in his bid for re-election to a third term, Democratic state Treasurer Bob Casey Jr., as he often does, portrays Mr. Santorum as a rubber-stamp for President Bushs policies. Those policies, Mr. Casey and mainstream environmental groups say, increase pollution and fail to curb global warming or reduce Americas oil dependence, foreign or domestic. With Sen. Santorum, when all is said and done, theres a lot more said than done by this senator and thats why I think we need a change in 2006, Mr. Casey said at the same forum. Mr. Casey opposes the new drilling.

Except for briefly this summer when gasoline prices topped $3 a gallon, the environmental positions of Mr. Casey and Mr. Santorum have drawn little attention. Polls show environmental issues rank low in priority right now among voters, though the environment has regularly taken the national stage in the senators current six-year term. Perhaps most notably, President Bush rejected the Kyoto Protocol because it didnt apply to developing countries such as China and India and backed new source review rules that allow companies to avoid installing costly new pollution-control measures. The protocol, a treaty approved by most of the rest of the industrialized world, aims to reduce global warming, which is caused when burned fossil fuels such as gasoline release carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. The gases trap heat and raise temperatures, an effect that many experts believe contributes to more frequent extreme weather. Mr. Santorum opposed the protocol and voted against a study of the new source review rules.

EDIT

http://www.thetimes-tribune.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=17...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Santorum (R)...the R is for rapacious? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Nov 22nd 2014, 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC