Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen. Martinez (R-FL) Boosts Alt. Energy (IOW Ethanol, Ethanol, Ethanol)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 01:05 PM
Original message
Sen. Martinez (R-FL) Boosts Alt. Energy (IOW Ethanol, Ethanol, Ethanol)
GAINESVILLE, Fla. - Florida needs to develop sources of renewable alternative energy to reduce its reliance on foreign oil and fossil fuels, U.S. Sen. Mel Martinez said Wednesday at an energy conference at the University of Florida. Joined by oil industry executives, power company officials and University of Florida professors, Martinez and U.S. Rep. Adam Putnam heralded the use of ethanol. Other alternative energy sources such as solar and wind received only scant mention.

"We need to change our mind-set in the U.S. and get away from viewing drilling as the answer, and instead put our energies behind alternative fuels as the only way to a better future," Martinez said.

Some researchers, however, said the amount of ethanol produced makes up only a small portion of the nation's fuel supply and its production has some environmental impacts. Martinez said there is only one commercial station in the state selling ethanol, although several companies have plans on the drawing boards to produce ethanol from grain, sugar cane or corn.

EDIT

But University of Minnesota professor Jason Hill, said Wednesday, if every kernel of corn in the country was made into ethanol, it would replace only 12 percent of the gasoline used in this country.

EDIT

http://www.bradenton.com/mld/bradenton/news/breaking_news/15289249.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. All that sugarcane in Cuba's starting to look better as Castro gets sicker
We're gonna spread Democracy all over 'em Cubans!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. ONe third the gasoline demand could be met by renewables according to
an Oak Ridge National Laboratory study (without taking from the food supply). Now, this is considering the development of cellulosic ethanol. Corn based (and sugar cane, sugar beets, etc) will not replace a large amount of the gasoline given current technology(although, Iowa State University has filed for a patent for a process using ultra-sound which boost alcohol yield from corn by about 30% (http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/06/060601213717.htm). But it is the quickest and most cost effective way we currently have to replace some of the gasoline and reduce our imports of oil. In about 5 to 6 years cellulosic ethanol should be cost effective and ready to be scaled up. I think the 12% figure mentioned is without touching food supplies. (but check below re cotton export subsidies)

Currently, ethanol represents about 3% of the total supply of gasoline (this takes about 12% of the acres devoted to growing corn). The production capacity under construction at the end of 2005 represented about a 62% increease in production capacity. Most of this will be coming on line during 2006. Currently, the oil companies are buying up ethanol to replace MTBE in gasoline. When this is accomplished ethanol will be 6% to 10% of the gasoline, depending on your location.

The increased production and availability of ethanol could be accelerated if there was interest in supporting it more aggressively at the national level. Considering the economic (balance of trade) and security implications (possibility of oil supply disruption) it's surprising we do not have more of a national initiative for increasing ethanol availability and supply.

for what it's worth, the World Trade Organization found the U.S. guilty of using export subsidies (costing $4 Billion per year) to support our cotton growers which enabled them to compete in world markets. Congress has sent up a bill to Bush for signature which would end export subsidies to cotton. Now, if he should deign to sign it, cotton would no longer be a profitable crop for farmers to grow and they would have to look for some other crop to grow. Given the tremendous demand for corn for ethanol they are likely to go to planting feed lot corn for ethanol. Given that the number of acres planted to cotton is about equal to the number of acres planted in corn for ethanol, if most cotton farmers chose to plant corn for ethanol this would mean about a 100% increase in the supply of corn for ethanol.

..if Bush signs the bill ending the $4 Billion dollar annual subsidies to cotton.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC