Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Michele Bachmann Envisions a World Without Food Industry Safety Standards

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
GoLeft TV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 08:50 PM
Original message
Michele Bachmann Envisions a World Without Food Industry Safety Standards
Republican Presidential candidate Michele Bachmann believes that the government needs to stay out of the business of protecting the foods we eat. At a campaign stop this week, she told her supporters that food suppliers are “overburdened” by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations. She informed the crowd that, yes, we need safety, but more importantly, we also need what she calls “common sense.”

Bachmann is joining in the chorus of conservative voices railing against “burdensome” regulations, but she is among the first to make the claim in regards to the food industry. Last December, Bachmann was one of the few members of Congress to vote against legislation that would have protected consumers by increasing the oversight of the food processing industry, a move that she claims would cause producers to spend more on safety and less on creating new jobs.

Bachmann was joined in her crusade against food safety standards last year by the conservative Heritage Foundation. Heritage went on the offensive last year when Congress debated legislation to increase food industry safety standards. Heritage claimed that regulation will never work, and that the free market has built in mechanisms that weed out any bad eggs who produce substandard goods

Full story and more of Bachmann's vision for a de-regulated America is available at DeSmogBlog - http://desmogblog.com/michele-bachmann-envisions-world-without-food-industry-safety-standards
Refresh | +6 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hate her fucking, stupid guts.
There is NO one more stupid than Bachmann and her ignorant followers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. she`s a dumb fuck....why are people like her given a public forum?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah.I can see
how that would work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Does she even listen to what she's saying?
a move that she claims would cause producers to spend more on safety and less on creating new jobs

That doesn't even make sense. What does she think happens when they spend money on food safety? Do they burn it as an offering to the food safety gods who then send magical food safety elves to ensure food safety?

No, when they spend money on food safety, that money employs people who clean equipment, inspect the food, etc. Money spent on food safety is money that employs people.

What does she think they would do with the money that they now spend on safety? Fire the cleaners and inspectors and hire other people to do something else? To do what? Not inspect food?

These companies fight these regulations so they can employ less people, not more!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
stuntcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. "These companies fight these regulations so they can employ less people, not more!"
thanks, this is a 100% true fact that my fellow citizens don't seem to care about. It's blowing away their babies' future but they won't do anything about it. just blows my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Children dying of E. coli tainted burgers is just fine with Bachmann,
because they aren't Sacred Fetuses (TM).
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
murphyj87 Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bachmann should look up the consequences of...
Edited on Mon Sep-26-11 04:25 AM by murphyj87
E. Coli, botulism, trichinosis and all the other food borne illnesses. If it were up to Bachmann, people with these food borne illnesses would not be able to afford the health care to be treated for them either, so they'd die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
CJvR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. They are right!
...and that the free market has built in mechanisms that weed out any bad eggs who produce substandard goods
Yes, they are called lynch mobs and are very effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
txlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. Social Darwinism
What else can you expect from her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC