Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

City dwellers produce as much CO2 as countryside people do

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 02:45 PM
Original message
City dwellers produce as much CO2 as countryside people do
http://www.aalto.fi/en/current//news/view/2011-06-22/

City dwellers produce as much CO2 as countryside people do

22.06.2011

Most previous studies have indicated that people in cities have a smaller carbon footprint than people who live in the country.

By using more complex methods of analysis than in the past, scientists at Aalto University in Finland have discovered that people's carbon emissions are practically the same in the city and in the rural areas. More than anything else, CO2 emissions that cause climate change are dependent upon how much goods and services people consume, not where they live.

In their study, Researcher Jukka Heinonen and Professor Seppo Junnila allocated carbon emissions to their consumption location, not their production location.

− If a TV set is made in a factory in the countryside but bought and used by a person in a town, the carbon emission generated from making the television should be allocated to the consumer, not to a manufacturer making it for the consumer, said Jukka Heinonen.



The study has been published in Environmental Research Letters (ERL) (http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/6/1/014018/fulltext).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. This only looks at consumption, not the opportunity cost associated with suburban sprawl
which in my opinion means their findings don't mean dick. If you cut down a forest to build a new suburban neighborhood you remove a carbon sink and add a carbon source. While at the same time if you reclaim a brownfield in an urban center lets say and old mill (they are all over new england) you get to keep your trees and house more people then some McMansion cul-de-sac hell will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes but the cow farts more than make up for it
in the greenhouse gas department.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC