Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Quick and (Mostly) Dirty History of New England’s Energy Supplies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 11:35 AM
Original message
A Quick and (Mostly) Dirty History of New England’s Energy Supplies
Recently we have come face to face with some of the hidden costs of our energy choices. The explosion on Deepwater Horizon rig and resulting oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico brought the true costs of offshore oil drilling into focus. Continued dependence on oil from an increasingly unstable Middle East makes us vulnerable to unpredictable spikes in price. The safety and dependability of nuclear power plants has undoubtedly been dealt a blow, at least temporarily, by the one-two punch of Japan's earthquake and tsunami that has crippled multiple nuclear reactors and threatened a vast area with a radioactive disaster. Natural gas development in the tight shale deposits under vast sections of this country is increasingly plagued with public fears about contamination from "hydro-fracking" techniques.

Meanwhile the effort to harness the region's winds as a component of the region's energy budget-onshore and off-has been hampered by view-shed concerns from those living on the shores of Cape Cod as well as other environmentalists in western Maine who want to protect the wilderness character of remote mountains, especially where views from the Appalachian Trail are concerned. The noises from turbines under certain wind conditions from neighbors within two or three thousand feet of a wind farm have raised other acute concerns that have been magnified by front page stories in the Maine Sunday Telegram, Boston Globe and New York Times and gone viral in the blogosphere where Wind Turbine Syndrome is an established fact to its denizens.

Here in New England, we all celebrate our traditions of rugged individualism, but protecting our individual needs and desires without any sense of what we require collectively is a recipe, if not for disaster, at least for paralysis, while the nation's energy policy is held hostage by our conflicting local interests-coal, nuclear, oil, natural gas and wind. Coal risks climate change; nuclear risks meltdowns; oil risks geopolitical instability; natural gas risks ground water pollution; wind risks view shed and noise intrusions. Someday soon we are going to have to make some real choices. You weigh the risks.

http://www.workingwaterfront.com/articles/Timber-Coal-Oil-and-Wind/14248/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. auto-kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC