Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

16 Years After Exxon Valdez, ExxonMobil Plans To Go Double-Hull - Sort Of

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 10:27 PM
Original message
16 Years After Exxon Valdez, ExxonMobil Plans To Go Double-Hull - Sort Of
"Sixteen years after one of its ships wrecked on Bligh Reef in Prince William Sound, spilling millions of gallons of oil, Exxon Mobil has cobbled together a partial plan to replace its fleet of single-hulled oil tankers with double-hulled vessels. The crux of the plan will see Exxon take over two aging double-hulled tankers now hauling North Slope crude oil for BP. Exxon plans to take the two tankers, the Kenai and the Tonsina, to a Singapore shipyard for an extensive refurbishment.

Exxon's shipping subsidiary, Houston-based SeaRiver Maritime Inc., currently runs four tankers between Valdez and West Coast refineries. All the ships are single hulls.

Exxon, with the other major oil companies in Alaska, Conoco Phillips and BP, is under time pressure to comply with federal law requiring that all oil tankers be double-hulled. The law generally requires double hulls by 2015, but many ships now in service have much earlier expiration dates based on their age and other factors. Exxon has one Alaska tanker facing retirement in October and another in March. The idea behind double hulls is that they might reduce the size of spills should a ship run aground.

SeaRiver spokesman Ray Botto said his company's purchase of the two BP ships is an interim step in a broader but still incomplete plan to upgrade the company's Alaska fleet. The plan could include building new, double-hulled tankers, he said. Exxon is lagging well behind the other two majors, Conoco and BP, which together are spending about $2 billion to build double-hulled tankers. Since 2001, Conoco has put four such ships into service and BP two, with each company expecting more new tankers in coming months."

EDIT

http://www.adn.com/front/story/6685166p-6571884c.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Time flies when you're having fun----
Edited on Thu Jul-07-05 10:46 PM by Coastie for Truth
The Coast Guard - and the American Bureau of Shipping (the maritime insurance carrier's engineering body) were screwing around with requiring double hulls 40 years ago.

Talk about the political muscle of Big Oil.

    That's when I was a slim, young Coast Guard Ensign ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-05 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fuck exxon.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thegreatwildebeest Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. What do you expect from Exxon?
Exxon, of the Big Three (BP and Shell being the other two), has always been the most flagrant and flouting of the laws. That's because its a descendant of the original Standard Oil main branch, Standard Oil New Jersey. It has inherited to a certain extent the brazen contempt that Standard Oil itself maintained.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov 26th 2014, 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC