Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Manitoba Thrilled W. US Court Decision Blocking Diversion From NoDak Into Canadian Watershed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 01:19 PM
Original message
Manitoba Thrilled W. US Court Decision Blocking Diversion From NoDak Into Canadian Watershed
Manitoba has won another round in its long-running legal dispute with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation over a water-diversion project that could allow invasive species from the United States into Lake Winnipeg and the rest of the Hudson Bay drainage basin.

The province has been trying to stop the project in nearby North Dakota to transfer water from the Missouri River that would ultimately flow into the Gulf of Mexico. The project would bring the water across the Continental Divide, into a parched area of North Dakota from where it would flow northward into Canada toward the Arctic. The water slated to be transferred - 13.3 million tonnes a year through a 72-kilometre-long pipeline - would be used around Minot, N.D. It would drain into the Souris River, which flows into Manitoba.

But the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has ordered the bureau to take a "hard look" at the threat the water transfer poses to Canada's environment, as well as water levels in the Missouri River. It is also keeping in place an injunction currently stopping completion of the controversial project. In its decision, the court said the consequences of having foreign species move into Canada "might be catastrophic."

EDIT

The legal dispute highlights the lack of legislation in Canada and the U.S. barring the movement of water from one drainage area to another, says Adele Hurley, director of the program on water issues at the Munk Centre for International Studies at the University of Toronto. She said the two countries need to develop laws to "keep water in its natural basins" because transfers "simply set off a new round of environmental issues, such as the movement of invasive species."

EDIT/END

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/manitoba-welcomes-us-ruling-against-water-pipeline-plan/article1495785/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. fuck with mother nature
at your peril.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC