Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Corn farmers achieve record yields and total production - with less than ideal conditions - USDA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 07:58 PM
Original message
Corn farmers achieve record yields and total production - with less than ideal conditions - USDA
Yield of 165.2 bushels per acre 7% higher than last years average yield. tota harvest was 13.2 billion bushels.


http://www.cattlenetwork.com/RFA--USDA-Report---Farmers-Shatter-Corn-Production-Records-On-Fewer-Acres/2010-01-12/Article_Latest_News.aspx?oid=974531&fid=CN-LATEST_NEWS_


The final report from the U.S. Department of Agriculture on the 2009 corn harvest is one for the record books. Despite poor planting conditions, a cool, wet growing season, and an abysmal harvest that still sees corn standing in fields, American farmers shattered records for both yield per acre and total production.

In the January Crop Production report, USDA estimates farmers averaged 165.2 bushels of corn per acres, up from its previous estimate of 162.9 and shattering the previous record of 160.4 in 2004. Notably, average yields are more than 11 bushels per acre higher (7 percent) than last year’s average yield. In addition, this record yield helped produce the largest corn crop ever – 13.2 billion bushels. All of this occurred despite one of the slowest and most challenging harvests on record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Might have something to do with this


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/12/monsantos-gmo-corn-linked_n_420365.html

We might grow more with GMO (which is still limited to animal feed here???) but I don't think we have enough data on the long term safety of such products to determine if this is a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. frankencorn - chemicals and GMO - for cows mostly time to end ALL corn subsidies nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC