Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Asteroid 2009 DD45 Missed Earth By About 49,000 Miles On Monday - Roughly Size Of Tunguska Object

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 02:07 PM
Original message
Asteroid 2009 DD45 Missed Earth By About 49,000 Miles On Monday - Roughly Size Of Tunguska Object
Edited on Wed Mar-04-09 02:10 PM by hatrack
PASADENA, Calif. — An asteroid about the size of one that blasted Siberia a century ago just buzzed the Earth.

The asteroid named 2009 DD45 was about 48,800 miles from Earth when it zipped past early Monday, NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory reported.

That is just twice as high as the orbits of some telecommunications satellites and about a fifth of the distance to the Moon.

"This was pretty darn close," astronomer Timothy Spahr of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics said Wednesday. The space rock measured between 69 feet and 154 feet in diameter. The Planetary Society said that made it the same size as the asteroid that exploded over Siberia in 1908 and leveled more than 800 square miles of forest.

EDIT

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/04/asteroid-2009-dd45s-passi_n_171722.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DemzRock Donating Member (824 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Too close for comfor... btw...
How is it that the Tunguska asteroid blew up OVER Siberia and not by hitting it? I never understood that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The heat of entering the earths atmosphere and it's high water(ice) content.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Theory is that it superheated on entry into the atmosphere...
and "blew apart" into millions of small gravel sized chunks, thus leaving almost no impact crater but the force of the
explosion knocked down trees for many many miles in all directions.

Had it been made with a solid iron core center, the area would now look more like this:



only bigger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. SciAm had a good article on tunguska last year.
A team of scientists found a lake the fits the profile for a residual impact crater. What was left after the aerial explosion. They were planning to return and try retrieving a fragment from the lake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. 49,000 MILES!!! That's too damn close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. Shame.
Better luck next time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. Earth Impact Effects Program
http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/impacteffects/

JPL Small-Body Database Browser
http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sstr=2009%20DD45;orb=1

You can play with the impacts program; if you need better info, maybe the orbital parameters data helps. Crudely speaking: at 10 km from the impact, you're seriously burned by the fireball radiation and also badly battered by the shock wave; at 100 km from the impact, you hear noise and the ground shakes a bit

If this had been on a collision course, I expect that with the limited notice, and lack of precise information about shape and cohesiveness of the object, there would be no chance of gauging with any precision how this would travel through the atmosphere, whether it would break into smaller pieces, and where the largest fragments might hit



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-05-09 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. The same Tunguska Object of which no trace
has yet been found, yes?

It was Tesla.

:evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Howard T38 Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
9. Return?
Has anyone seen any info on possible returns?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC