Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

British secretly dumped Maralinga plutonium in ocean

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 12:41 PM
Original message
British secretly dumped Maralinga plutonium in ocean
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,24852959-954,00.html

British secretly dumped Maralinga plutonium in ocean
Charles Miranda
December 30, 2008 10:00am

NUCLEAR waste from UK tests at Maralinga in the 1950s may have been dumped at sea despite the Federal Government ordering a proper clean-up.

<snip>

However, declassified British Government documents to be released publicly today under the 30-year rule reveal for the first time the plutonium's final resting place was probably the ocean floor.

At the height of the nuclear debate in Australia in 1978 the British agreed to clean the site they contaminated between 1955 and 1963, predominantly because they wanted to win favour with then prime minister Malcolm Fraser to secure exports of mined uranium to meet their growing energy needs.

<snip>

The British authorities demanded their Australian counterparts maintain maximum secrecy over the issue and reminded them they were under no legal obligation to clean up their contaminated work in Australia.

<snip>

Hundreds of servicemen and their families from Britain and Australia have sought compensation for exposure and a range of contracted cancers.

<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-08 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressive_realist Donating Member (669 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That is probably the safest place to put it.
Plutonium is denser than any natural substance, so it will tend to stay at the bottom. It has a long half-life of approximately 24,000 years and when it does decay, it converts to uranium, which has an even longer half-life, so the rate of release of radiation is very slow. The radiation released is alpha, which is only harmful to organisms in its immediate proximity. And it would be practically impossible for would-be terrorists to find and retrieve the fissile material.

The only real danger is that the plutonium is ingested by sea creatures and thereby enters the human food chain. But I am not aware of any animals that make a practice of chewing on chunks of ultra-dense metal. Plus anything that consumed appreciable amounts of it would die quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC