Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EU wants end to old-style bulbs (BBC)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-08 06:17 PM
Original message
EU wants end to old-style bulbs (BBC)
A European Union report has recommended banning conventional incandescent light bulbs by 2012 to save energy and cut down on greenhouse gas emissions.

Most bulbs sold in the EU are of the type pioneered by Thomas Edison in 1879.

But the report says the EU could save up to $12bn (8bn) a year in energy bills by switching to low-energy bulbs.

The report needs the backing of the European parliament and all 27 member states to become law.

"It's very clear that this is a measure that will change the way that we consume energy," EU Energy Commissioner Andris Piebalgs told journalists.
***
more: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7772412.stm

Note that both halogen and CF bulbs are an improvement over classical incandescent.

Delmarva area: CF's are still available for $1 from Ace Hardware, as part of a program in cooperation with Delmarva Power, last time I checked (about two days ago).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. I can't believe the Democratic Congress is actually ahead of Europe on this
amazing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Defending the incandescent
I wonder how much of that "savings" in low-energy bulbs will be plowed right back into heat to make up for the lack of heat coming from the light fixtures? Since Europe is quite northerly, the need for light (the long winter nights) comes at the same time as the need for heat, which incandescent bulbs also provide. I would believe their savings calculations if I thought the lights were on while the air conditioning was trying to keep up, or if it was for outdoor lighting, but I don't think that is the majority of the time. I think their calculation is lacking in evaluating second order effects and assuming that heat put out by incandescent bulbs is a purely unwanted effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Apr 20th 2014, 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC