Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Population bomb 'ticks louder than climate'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
stuntcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 09:30 AM
Original message
Population bomb 'ticks louder than climate'
Population bomb 'ticks louder than climate'
BY ROSSLYN BEEBY SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENT REPORTER
22/07/2008
Global population growth is looming as a bigger threat to the world's food production and water supplies than climate change, a leading scientist says.

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/local/news/general...

(I haven't read the article yet, I just got it okay.
It sounds true but of course these things are too closely related to be argued over this way.. I think. Guess I better just read it.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for posting this. (thanking you before I've read it also)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. About the only actions that have ever been shown to help limit population
is supplying the populace with a high quality education (and this includes women in countries that don't typically encourage the education of women). When the people truly understand what's happening to the planet they'll think twice before having any children at all-unless we make real strides in solving our environmental and energy problems. Why bring new life into the world if that new life doesn't have a future?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. agree
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. While I agree there's a population problem, I still think he's got it backwards.
Khan says, "Climate change is one of a number of stresses we're facing, but it's overshadowed by global population growth and the amount of water, land and energy needed to grow food to meet the projected increase in population. We are facing a world population crisis."

I agree with the last sentence -- there is indeed a crisis -- but I'm utterly convinced that this is the wrong way too look at the problem. The core of the problem is not simply that a rising population needs more food, but that producing more food results in a rising population. In a sense it's a feedback loop. More people need more food, more food permits more people, who then need more food, which then permits more people... This vicious cycle is hard to see because of our belief that population is an independent variable, when in fact it's dependent on the food supply.

Carrying capacity is the population that a given ecological niche (in the case of humans that's the whole planet) can support. In all species the population will rise until it meets the carrying capacity of the niche, then it will stabilize. By continually expanding the world's food production we are in effect raising the human carrying capacity of the planet. Given that, is it any wonder that our population keeps expanding?

I don't think there is any species-wide way out of this trap short of running into some limit on food production. Educating women will help, but only regionally. However, it may not work well enough to lower the total fertility of poor, high-growth regions below 2.1. Enriching everyone in those areas in addition to educating them would work, but there isn't enough energy or productive capacity available to lift the 3 billion people in them to a level of consumption where the demographic transition could take place.

Our population is destined to keep growing (slower and slower, but growing nonetheless) until we exhaust our means of feeding more people. At that point it will stabilize, but the world will be a very different place by then due to resource exhaustion, biodiversity loss, pollution and climate change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stuntcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. righto!
it's weird how he's got it twisted.. Like, we've populated so much that it's harming our need to populate more? like duh
He's someone who's just this close to realizing the fact :p
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Sep 21st 2014, 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC