Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The New Trophy Home, Small and Ecological

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 11:09 AM
Original message
The New Trophy Home, Small and Ecological
For the high-profile crowd that turned out to celebrate a new home in Venice, Calif., the attraction wasn’t just the company and the architectural detail. The house boasted the builders’ equivalent of a three-star Michelin rating: a LEED platinum certificate.

The actors John Cusack and Pierce Brosnan, with his wife, Keely Shaye Smith, a journalist, came last fall to see a house that the builders promised would “emit no harmful gases into the atmosphere,” “produce its own energy” and incorporate recycled materials, from concrete to countertops.

Behind the scenes were Tom Schey, a homebuilder in Santa Monica, and his business partner, Kelly Meyer, an environmentalist whose husband, Ron, is the president of Universal Studios. Ms. Meyer said their goal was to show that something energy-conscious “doesn’t have to look as if you got it off the bottom shelf of a health-food store.”

“It doesn’t have to smell like hemp,” she said.

That was probably a good thing. The four-bedroom house was for sale, with a $2.8 million asking price.

Its rating was built into that price. LEED — an acronym for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, is the hot designer label, and platinum is the badge of honor — the top classification given by the U.S. Green Building Council. “There’s kind of a green pride, like driving a Prius,” said Brenden McEneaney, a green building adviser to the city of Santa Monica, adding, “It’s spreading all over the place.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/22/us/22leed.html?th&emc=th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. “It’s spreading all over the place.” at 2.8 million, I doubt that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Reminds me of "mass produced" hydrogen cars priced like a Ferrari.
I can't recall the last time I noticed a Ferrari on the road. Their mass must not be very large.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It it's good for the mass of millionaires, it's ecological.
I may have this wrong, but I recall reading somewhere that the richest 1% of the world owns 50% of the world's resources.

The theory that only millionaire stuff counts gets a lot of respect here and elsewhere, not from me necessarily, but from a number of seld described "thinkers."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. On that subject, I came to a realization...
which is that expensive "limousine liberal" solutions aren't especially worth getting upset about.

One of two things will happen. Either a solution becomes affordable enough to be useful to most people, in which case everybody wins, or it remains unaffordable, in which case it stays marginal no matter how many puff pieces get published about it.

The only scenario that concerns me these days is if some solution becomes cheap, but has high environmental cost. Coal is killing us because it's both very cheap and very polluting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That would be true of millionaires weren't running around opposing options for those who are not
millionaires.

That is not the case however.

The anti-nuke movement was born in Lloyd's Neck, NY, one of the wealthiest enclaves in the world. LILCO had the unmitigated gall to suggest building a power plant - a nuclear power plant - where the rich folks live.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC