Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Federal court overturns initiative 297. Voters can't bar hazardous waste from Hanford.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 10:14 PM
Original message
Federal court overturns initiative 297. Voters can't bar hazardous waste from Hanford.
Washington voters don't have the authority to stop the dumping of radioactive waste in the state, according to a ruling Wednesday by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

In 2004, nearly 70 percent of voters approved Initiative 297, which banned the import and disposal of hazardous waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation until the massive, polluted site was cleaned up.

The federal government, which is overseeing the multibillion dollar cleanup, immediately challenged I-297 in court.

In June 2006, U.S. District Judge Alan McDonald in Yakima ruled that the initiative was unconstitutional because it trumped federal law. The state, residents and nonprofit groups fought to defend I-297.

"I don't think this decision closes the door in any definitive way as to whether there is a way for the state to regulate hazardous waste coming to a facility that is noncompliant and seriously contaminated," said Andy Fitz, the state Attorney General Office's lead lawyer on the case.

There is no decision yet as to whether to appeal the ruling, Fitz said.

Through the initiative, Washington sought to regulate radioactive waste dumping at Hanford "out of concern for the health and environmental risks that increased contamination will cause," the federal appeals court ruling said.

But, the court concluded, the law created by the initiative falls within jurisdiction of the federal Atomic Energy Act of 1954.

More: http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/363984_hanford22.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
angstlessk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. the supreme court will quote boosh v gore and state this does not a precedent
make...a president maybe, but not a precedent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. They need to take this to their Senators
The action has to happen on a federal level. Plus, Hanford is a military site, though the Department of Energy has authority over the clean-up. There are a couple of points at which to apply pressure. I'm sure both Senators will be happy to oblige.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC