Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oregon's ethanol requirement lowers vehicles' miles per gallon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 02:36 PM
Original message
Oregon's ethanol requirement lowers vehicles' miles per gallon


•Because the biofuel has less energy, the state's 10 percent requirement means drivers are buying more gas

When ethanol began flowing into Oregon fuel tanks early this year, its costly little secret was scarcely mentioned: It packs one-third less explosive energy than gasoline and so reduces vehicle mileage on the road.

Good news: The Oregon requirement calls for just a 10 percent blend with gasoline, known as E10, and cuts into mileage an estimated 3 percent, according to official estimates. But that costs you an additional $73 a year at the fuel pump, based on today's prices for regular gasoline.

Bad news: Many Oregonians don't believe the 3 percent figure and maintain the drop is 10 percent or more, raising out-of-pocket costs much higher. It's enough to throw into question the real cost of cleaner air from ethanol use and reduced dependence on fossil fuels.

When Oregon lawmakers enthusiastically passed the alternative fuels bill in 2007, they barely mentioned ethanol's lower energy content. Instead, they emphasized E10's benefits: cleaner air and a healthier economy.

Now, record-high gas prices have thrown the mileage gap into sharp relief. Tapped-out consumers are scrutinizing every penny they have to shell out at the pump and track any discernable upticks. Drivers are finding that their mileage has dropped far more than 3 percent.

"It's just not fair to anyone who drives a car," said Ron Spuhler, a retiree who lives in Gresham and now gets 21.5 miles per gallon in his 1999 Buick, instead of prior, ethanol-free readings of 24 miles per gallon.

That's a drop of 10 percent and an extra $7 every time he fills the tank.

More: http://www.oregonlive.com/environment/index.ssf/2008/05/oregons_ethanol_requirement_lo.html

------------

Ethanol basics:

Bang per gallon: At 75,670 BTUs per gallon, ethanol has 66 percent of the energy-creating power of gasoline, which has 115,400 BTUs per gallon.

It's the law: Ethanol is cleaner burning and home-grown, big pluses to lawmakers who passed the law during the 2007 session. In a phased plan, Oregon requires all gasoline stations to pump E10 -- gasoline cut with 10 percent ethanol -- by Sept. 15.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. I thought E10 meant that ethanol replaced most the chemical additives
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. American Coalition on Ethanol tests show that E20, E30 cars get better mileage than conventional gas
http://www.biofuelsdigest.com/blog2/2007/12/06/american-coalition-on-ethanol-tests-show-that-e20-e30-cars-get-better-mileage-than-conventional-gasoline/


Oh my, the BTU's are just part of the picture. octane is important too.

Everybody knows ethanol has an octane rating of 113 vesus high test gas with 92-93. If you optiiiimize for the higher octane you should do better with higher octane fuel than with lower octane fuel. Sometimes even if the engine isn't optimized for the higher octane the car does better with higher octane fuel (not too much though) such as ethanol 10% -20%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
losthills Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow! What a panacea.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. The MPG might be slightly less, but ethanol is way cheaper than
gasoline right now, so they should be coming out ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC