Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Human Pollution Of Arctic Dates Back At Least 138 Years, Study Reveals - Deseret News

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 12:17 PM
Original message
Human Pollution Of Arctic Dates Back At Least 138 Years, Study Reveals - Deseret News
For how long have humans polluted the Arctic? Thirty years? Forty? According to research published by two University of Utah scientists, the answer is at least 138 years, and possibly much longer. The study may improve understanding of global climate change. "Perhaps there was significant warming of the Arctic even 100 years ago or so," said Tim Garrett, assistant professor of meteorology at the U.

Garrett and Lisa Verzella, former undergraduate students in the department of meteorology, researched the question of air pollution in the Arctic and found that particulates from industrial sources were observed by an Arctic explorer in 1870. The findings of Garrett, lead author, and Verzella are to be published in the March edition of the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society under the title "An Evolving History of Arctic Aerosols."

In earlier work, Garrett attempted to estimate the effect of haze on the Arctic climate, particularly its effect on clouds. He showed that aerosol pollution blows northward from developed countries and into the Arctic. The pollution affects the clouds in a way that warms the arctic surface and is involved in melting the region's ice. It is most prevalent in the winter and spring.

When air pollution in the Arctic was measured in detail during the 1970s by Glenn Shaw of the University of Alaska, he said, "There was a huge amount of skepticism that this could possibly be true, that the Arctic, which is such a remote place, would have high levels of aerosol pollution." The amount Shaw measured was equivalent to air pollution in a city at more temperate climes. Studies continued through the 1990s, and Shaw found reports from Air Force pilots who had carried out reconnaissance flights in the Arctic in the 1940s and '50s. They had discovered haze at high altitudes, but the reports had gone largely unnoticed until Shaw dug them up.

EDIT

http://deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,695263159,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC