Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New York Seeks to Block Nuclear Plant License Renewal (Indian Point)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 08:06 PM
Original message
New York Seeks to Block Nuclear Plant License Renewal (Indian Point)
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/dec2007/2007-12-03-092.asp

NEW YORK, New York, December 3, 2007 (ENS) - New York state officials took their battle against relicensing of the aging Indian Point nuclear power plant on the Hudson River to another level today.

New York Governor Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, and Westchester County Executive Andrew Spano have submitted documents asking the federal government to deny the relicensing of Indian Point sought by owner-operator Entergy Corporation.

The papers filed with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NRC, identify dangerous deficiencies in Entergy's relicensing application for Indian Point related to terrorism, earthquakes, evacuation plans, and the surrounding population density.

"The Indian Point relicensing application wholly fails to address a number of crucial issues, and it should not be granted in its present form," said Governor Spitzer.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. This, of course, is another attempt by anti-nukes to let people die from air pollution.
In fact, as is the case with every other single nuclear power plant that has been shut by ignorance - this plant will be replaced by dangerous fossil fuels, generating million ton quantities of dangerous fossil fuel waste.

And let's be clear what the word "dangerous" means. It means harming, like dangerous fossil fuels do every single time they are used.

I have not noticed any whining or crying from the dangerous fossil fuel "renewables will save us" industry about the people in Japan who have died from the damage to the KK7 plant, although I have noticed a lot of whining and crying about a few liters of spilled radioactive water.

The Indian Point nuclear power station has produced more energy in the last twenty years than the make belive solar industry has produced in the last 50 years.

In fact, it will be MY children who will suffer for this paen to ignorance, just as the children on Long Island suffered from the ignorant stupidity that caused the Shoreham plant not to operate.

Nuclear power doesn't have to be risk free to be superior to EVERY other form of exajoule scale energy. It merely has to be better than its alternatives and it is.

This is true in the natural gas kingdom of Maine; it is true in New York; it is true in Pakistan; it is true in Iran; it is true in Slovakia and it is true in New York.

In fact, even honest wind power researchers and advocates know this. (The word "honest" would necessarily preclude mention of the dangerous fossil fuel apologist Amory Lovins, who never saw a situation he wouldn't greenwash for money.)

In 2005, 28 years after the moral moron Amory Lovins told us that wind powered compressed air "was just around the corner" the wind researcher Paul Denholm wrote a life cycle analysis for various forms of continuously available energy.

http://pubs.acs.org/cgi-bin/abstract.cgi/esthag/2005/39/i06/abs/es049946p.html

He found that the dangerous fossil fuel natural gas produced about between 400-500 grams of carbon dioxide per kw-hr, and that the theoretical (but still make believe) wind/compressed air systems would produce between 67 and 104 grams of dangerous fossil fuel waste (carbon dioxide) per kw-hr. Note that nobody on this planet who knows how to read actually believes that New York is going to build a compressed air/wind system that is comparable with Indian Point.

By comparison to the real agenda of the anti-nuke religion - promoting dangerous natural gas (Schroeder and Lovins) and pushing coal (Schroeder), Denholm, wind researcher, reports that nuclear power produces between 10-25 grams of carbon dioxide per kw-hr, the lowest of all forms of exajoule scale energy and, in fact, 4 times lower than fantasy wind systems promoted by scientifically illiterate radiation paranoids.

Indian Point has killed zero people, which is far different than the number of people who will be killed by the dangerous fossil fuels being sold by the anti-nuke religion.

The effort to close this plant is nothing more than an attempt to KILL in service to ignorance.

The people who will be injured by this paen to stupidity are MY children, by the way. I live close enough to New York to have my children's lungs be directly effected (i.e. physically poisoned) by this blank and unnecessary ignorance.

Ignorance KILLS. It always has. It always will.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Eliot Spitzer, Andrew Cuomo and Andrew Spano are killing your children
Is this what the alien implant is telling you today???

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
3.  Ignorance KILLS.
Period.

People will die from air pollution in Indian Point is shut. Period. The injured people will be spread around the world. Mostly they will be poor.

You couldn't care less, which is why you find it funny. It's about what one would expect from an indifferent yuppie hanging on out mommy's estate arguing with the servants about the beans.

I am glad you are amused by climate change gases. I have seen zero interest that you care in any way about them.

Meanwhile, neither Elliot Spitzer nor certainly Cuomo are competent to judge energy safety.

Maybe the little windmill you pray to each night is teling you that Denholm's paper is wrong, and that TO KILL the members of the yuppie car culture only need to read news reports by suck-up politicians informed by an ignorant press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
losthills Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-06-07 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. 46,000 projected deaths...
The Plant
There are three reactors at Indian Point, only numbers 2 and 3 are operating on-line.

The facility is located about 24 miles north of New York City, and is situated in the most densely populated region in the nation.
Indian Point 1 started operating in 1963 and was forced to shut down 11 years later due to a lack of emergency cooling.
Indian Point 2 and Indian Point 3 were approved and construction began in the 1960s. Indian Point 2 began operating in 1973, and Indian Point 3 followed two years later. Combined their capacity is 2,000 megawatts of energy.
The operating licenses for Indian Point 2 and 3 expire in 2013 and 2015 respectively.
Until recently, Indian Point 2 had the worst safety rating of all 103 reactors in the US.
Both reactors continue to be plagued with unscheduled shutdowns due to emergencies.
The spent fuel rods are stored on site in containment pool, which leaks gallons of radioactive water leaks regularly. Entergy is constructing dry cask for storing older spent fuel rods.
The sirens, which would be used in an evacuation, have been plagued with problems for years.
In April 2007, Entergy (owner and operator of Indian Point) filed for a 20 year license extension with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

...

The Studies
CALCULATIONS OF REACTOR ACCIDENT CONSEQUENCES STUDY (CRAC-2)

This study was commissioned by the NRC in 1982 to evaluate the consequences of meltdowns at all working US reactors.
The study deemed a 17.5 mile radius around Indian Point as a "Peak Fatality Zone," and a 50 mile radius as a "Peak Injury Zone." (Nearly 21 million people live within this zone in NY, PA, NJ and CT)
A meltdown at Indian Point-2 would result in 46,000 near-term deaths and 141,000 near-term injuries.
A meltdown at Indian Point-3 would result in 50,000 near-term deaths and 167,000 near-term injuries.
A meltdown at either reactor would cause $500.5 billion worth of property damage in Westchester ALONE! Homeowner's insurance policies do not cover nuclear damage.

1997 BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB STUDY

A disaster at the spent fuel facility could cause anywhere from 1,500 to 143,000 cancer deaths.
A spent fuel disaster could cause from $800 million to $560 billion in damage.
A spent fuel disaster could render as much as 2,700 square miles around the plant uninhabitable.

From NYPIRG

There's more, a lot more-- here:
http://www.nypirg.org/energy/indianpt.html

peace...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boblynn Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-06-07 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Immunity for who?
Hi I'm An energy novice. The The Indian Point nuclear power station, operates under a special deal with the Nuclear industry that provides no legal Liability for any accident that would make my property in North West NJ totally worthless along with NYC in the event of a Chernobyl type of accident. They are are for profit business who care about profits not about our health.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC