Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Platts - Q3 Liquids Output From Top 7 Oil Majors Off 6% Over 2006 Numbers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 10:55 PM
Original message
Platts - Q3 Liquids Output From Top 7 Oil Majors Off 6% Over 2006 Numbers
The wheels may be wobbling and a few clouds may be gathering on the horizon for market bulls, but the bandwagon that seems to be taking headline crude oil futures relentlessly towards a watershed $100 per barrel level carried on purposefully last week. Critically, the peak oil debate that has started to frame the current rally in crude futures attracted new data to consider on November 2.

A Platts survey showed third-quarter global production of oil liquids at seven key publicly traded international majors declined 6% from last year, with output down 664,000 b/d at a time when some officials are calling for increased production from OPEC.

EDIT

The implications of the data appear more complicated than indicated by the raw numbers. For example, the largest producer, ExxonMobil, said a reduced share of actual production from African entitlements were to blame for its 4% downturn in the quarter. Excluding those special factors, ExxonMobil said its liquids output actually would have risen 3%. Besides ExxonMobil, the Platts review focused only on liquids production comparisons for integrated majors BP, Shell, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Eni and Marathon Oil. It determined those companies reported collective liquids output of 10,338,000 b/d for the quarter ended September 30, down from 11,002,000 b/d in the same period a year ago.

Liquids production fell at six of the seven companies and stood flat at Chevron, leaving Barclay's Capital analyst Paul Horsnell to question the ability of the international oil companies to respond to increasing demand and pricing. "Barclays Capital has taken a very deadbeat view on non-OPEC supply growth in recent years, mainly due to our view that the rate of decline in mature fields was being underestimated by consensus," said Horsnell, responding by email from London to questions. He added: "The weakness appears consistent to us with what has been a long period of output under-performance."

EDIT

http://www.platts.com/Oil/Resources/Futures/index.xml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. We are past the peak. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC