Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Regenerative braking for humans?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
amerikat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 10:34 PM
Original message
Regenerative braking for humans?
This is just plain stupid. What are they smoking at MIT?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20201266/

An article about using the energy produced by the movement of large numbers of people.

Maybe this story is a hoax?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. ?i don't get your confusion
It makes sense, the energy would otherwise be transferred as heat, sound, whatever. If you could capture a little bit, it might help. Nobody's saying this is imminent, just possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amerikat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The energy to build such an apparatus to capture the energy would
consume way more energy than could ever be extracted from it. I think we need simpler more practical ideas to deal with our energy dilemma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. No, I don't think it's a hoax
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/9.02/baylis_pr.html
Issue 9.02 - Feb 2001

The Greatest Shoe on Earth

...

The heel insert, he shows me, is fashioned from piezoelectric crystal, a cheap, quartz-type compound polarized with zaps of electricity. When a piece of piezo is bent, squeezed, or struck, it produces a high voltage at very low current - rather like the static electricity created by rubbing fur on a balloon. "We then put that charge back through a little electronic circuit," says Baylis, "which sorts it out before squirting it into the battery of the mobile phone, held in a pouch sewn on the back of the boot."

Like most of his Alka-Seltzer moments ("when the idea hits my brain and starts to fizz"), this one came to Baylis in his sleep, more than 40 years ago. Drafted into the army, he served as a physical training instructor. "One of the things we used was a treadmill. We called it the runway and it was literally propelled by its user. I dreamed of putting a dynamo on it to create power. The electric-shoe concept has been in my mind all these years. As long as I have been getting my shoes resoled by the cobbler I have been aware that my feet are doing work."

He's not the only one. In 1998, the MIT Media Lab demonstrated some experimental shoes that generated just enough power to send out a radio identification code. But only with the advent of the wireless Web and low-power portable electronics did Baylis believe the concept's time had come. "All these WAPs and PalmPilots, they need fack-all power. And who are the biggest consumers of those gizmos? I'll tell ya: It's these techno kids with baggy trousers. They'll spend a fortune every few months just to keep up with the times, but even with the latest palmtop or whatever, they can't go very far away without recharging. They still can't take it to a weeklong rock festival in the desert or trekking through Nepal."

On January 10 of last year, Baylis and two longtime collaborators - John Monteith, a mechanical engineer, and Barry James, an electrical engineer - filed a patent for their electric-shoe idea. "It was 50 pages long and stuffed with as many schoolboy options as possible," Baylis recalls. "We threw it all in the pot, our attitude being quite frankly that if somebody had any claims upon any forms of technology that we embraced, then they would come at us, in which case we'd say, 'Fine, we'll either work with you or work around you.'"

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Feh! When I first heard about piezo...
I thought of tying a bunch of them to trees so they could generate when the wind blew, and hooking them up to floating piers for tide energy...

Never actually did any of this stuff, except for small experiments, but what the hell. If it's a good idea, someone will.

Next "discovery" will be Peltier devices.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foo_bar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. it's a little out there, but the concept is valid
It seems like there'd be a better return placing such a system under roadways, since displacement of energy occurs on a greater scale and at greater expense, but maybe this could turn an energy profit in Hong Kong or New York before the maintenance costs kicked in (e.g., entropy in the form of potholes). If those other MIT guys figure out "WiTricity" we won't need this kind of infrastructure anyway, since our sneakers will Bluetooth the spare energy to the nearest Con Edison pylon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoFederales Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. Given MSNBC as the carrier of the story, it's pretty and sensational hoakem,
especially for believers in entertainment and fantastical thinking. My students have utilized regenerative braking in motors designed for solar bike and car races to help replensish limited energy allowed for battery packs--a specific system designed whereby an electric traction motor, during a braking phase, becomes a generator, thereby lending a small charge back to the energy storage system (the battery pack).

But isn't it the basic premise of that movie Monster's Inc whereby fear, and later, laughter is tapped for energy? Also reminiscent is the old Charles Schulz comic Peanuts where Lucy is concerned about the world population's ambulatory effect on the turning of the Globe. Conservation principles and thermodynamics notwithstanding, it is possible to recover some energy transformations to boost efficiency, but without better reporting about what is being claimed in the MSNBC article, I'll wait for a refereed technical report about MIT's efforts before I applaud or deride a conclusion: articles like this give science and technology a poor reputation.

NoFederales
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC