Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Corn Reserves Expected To Fall To 15-Year Low On Rising Demand From Ethanal Producers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:44 PM
Original message
US Corn Reserves Expected To Fall To 15-Year Low On Rising Demand From Ethanal Producers
Rising demand for corn from ethanol producers is pushing U.S. reserves to the lowest point in 15 years, a trend that could lead to higher grain and food prices this year.

The Agriculture Department on Friday left its estimate for corn reserves unchanged from the previous month. The reserves are projected to fall to 675 million bushels in late August, when the harvest begins, or roughly 5 percent of all corn consumed in the United States. That would be the lowest surplus level since 1996.

The limited supply is chiefly because of increasing demand from ethanol makers, which rose 1 percent to 5 billion bushels. That's about 40 percent of the total crop.

But the increase didn't alter the agency's overall estimate, mostly because livestock producers are expected to scale back their corn purchases.

MORE...

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2011/04/08/national/a060140D56.DTL
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Please explain to me why we're using potential food for fuel
instead of other types of biomass? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Corn industry lobbying, I think
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Decrease corn syrup in foods 10%
Better for health, use less corn. The other idea involves not forcing popcorn on everyone. Selling 55 gallon drums of popcorn at the movies where half ends up on the floor is such a waste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. What? You going against the powerful Ethanol lobby?
Ethanol...it is hydro carbon burning. Why is it better than gasoline for
atmosphere?

Ethanol...one of the reason food prices are going up is corn is a big part of animal
and chicken feed. Not to mention human consumption.

Ethanol...Is a loser from energy equation. The amount of energy you get from burning
Ethanol is not much more than what it takes to grow corn and process it into Ethanol.
Sugar cane is more efficient but we don't have the climate or soil Brazil has.

Ethanol...cars get less mileage per gallon than gasoline and it runs hotter which
shortens engine life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
orangeapple Donating Member (167 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. RFS
"Under the "Renewable Fuel Standards" (RFS) provision of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, Congress has mandated that petroleum refiners blend increasing amounts of corn ethanol into the nation's gasoline supply. In 2010, roughly 12 billion gallons of corn ethanol will be required to be blended in the U.S., displacing 6.5% of the gasoline supply while using about 30% of the corn crop. This number is mandated to increase to 15 billion gallons by 2015.

Corn ethanol is subsidized in the form of the $0.45/gal Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax Credit (a.k.a. "blender's credit") that refiners receive for purchasing corn ethanol to meet their requirements under the RFS mandates. This credit ensures that a refiner will actually purchase the ethanol rather than pay a penalty of non-compliance."

It doesn't make sense economically, environmentally, or thermodynamically. Obviously a political solution.
Only Congress could figure out how to ruin your boat motor and make your taco more expensive in the same step. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC