Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Smoking gun that Greenspan planned Housing bubble...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 03:23 PM
Original message
Smoking gun that Greenspan planned Housing bubble...
Denninger reports the smoking gun, quoting a 2002 Paul Krugman article.

"To fight this ( the 2001 ) recession the Fed needs more than a snapback; it needs soaring household spending to offset moribund business investment. And to do that, as Paul McCulley of Pimco put it,
Alan Greenspan needs to create a housing bubble to replace the Nasdaq bubble.

Judging by Mr. Greenspan's remarkably cheerful recent testimony, he still thinks he can pull that off.
But the Fed chairman's crystal ball has been cloudy lately; remember how he urged Congress to cut taxes to head off the risk of excessive budget surpluses? And a sober look at recent data is not encouraging....

Bear in mind also that government officials have a stake in accentuating the positive. The administration needs a recovery because, with deficits exploding, the only way it can justify that tax cut is by pretending that it was just what the economy needed. Mr. Greenspan needs one to avoid awkward questions about his own role in creating the stock market bubble.

Full story and more revelations at link:
http://market-ticker.denninger.net/archives/1124-None-Of-This-Was-A-Mistake.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. If it can be proven that the financial fraud that created the housing
bubble was known and encouraged at the highest levels because they knew it would create the bubble and they wanted the bubble then that should result in criminal and civil lawsuits the likes of which the world has never seen.

Greenspan should be personally buried in so many lawsuits that his estate won't be able to dig their way out for generations.

x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Same as Torture
Edited on Wed Jun-17-09 03:35 PM by MannyGoldstein
It'll be prosecuted ASAP.

Don't worry, be happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Cheney administration's response: "Don't criminalize fascism."
Well, in their bizarro jargon: "don't criminalize policy differences."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Greenspan was nothing more than a shill for the financial interests
in this country...

As for the rest of us who were forced to live under the Greenspan socialism for the rich regime, well, omce again we are forced to bear the cost of his socialism for the upper crust and bare nakid capitalism for the rest of us...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Proud to long proffered on this board: Greenspan, a name that will live in
infamy. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. how about a class action lawsuit?
Why wait for the government to prosecute? How about a couple hundred million people each contribute a couple bucks to pay for the biggest contingent of pit bulls, sharks and pirahna lawyers ever seen. Against Greenspan and his "team."

I'm ready. The savings are down to the bitter end, but I can still come up with a couple bucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xiamiam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. ive often wondered that myself...why cant we the people just get our own attorneys to prosecute for
war crimes and wall street..obviousy, i don't understand the legal system but it seems like a good idea to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ah yes, Ayn Rand's favorite disciple, Alan Greenspan.
Well, maybe he wasn't her favorite but he no doubt wanted to be.

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2008/10/25-6
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/15/business/15atlas.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print

So clever to put him in charge of our economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC