Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bankruptcy Modification and the Emperor's New Clothes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 01:25 PM
Original message
Bankruptcy Modification and the Emperor's New Clothes

A new argument being advanced against bankruptcy modification is that it will result in trillions of dollars of losses and the collapse of the financial system. This is the "the sky will fall" argument.

Leaving aside the grossly inflated numbers, let's be really clear that these are not losses that would be caused by bankruptcy modification. These losses exist with or without bankruptcy modification. All bankruptcy modification does is force these losses to be recognized now, rather than at some point down the road. Bankruptcy modification doesn't change the underlying insolvency of many financial institutions. One way or another, there are a lot of financial institutions that have to be recapitalized.


Financial institutions want to delay loss recognition as long as possible. Maybe they're hoping that the market will magically rebound. Maybe they think that 2006 prices are the "real" prices and "2009" prices are a very short-lived aberration. But here's the crucial point: homeowners bear the cost of delayed loss recognition by financial institutions. Delayed loss recognition means homeowners floundering in unrealistic repayment plans and then losing their homes in foreclosure. Delayed loss recognition means frozen credit markets because no one trusts financial institutions' balance sheets. Delayed loss recognition means magnifying, shifting, and socializing losses. We only make matters worse when we try to pretend that these losses don't exist.

http://www.creditslips.org/creditslips/2009/01/bankrupt...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. How many fewer foreclosures would there have been under the "old" bankruptcy law?
The bitches set us up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riley18 Donating Member (883 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-09 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bush allowed the credit card companies and banks to rewrite the laws in 2005.
Let's see if the bankruptcy laws are changed the way many of the other bush policies are being corrected. I have not heard anything about changing the laws back to the way they were. It makes no sense to my why I would pay to declare bankruptcy only to ruin my credit rating and still have to pay the credit card companies anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Dec 22nd 2014, 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC