425
DONATIONS
Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

CNBC talking about Morgan Stanley and other banks putting oil in tankers.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Jan-16-09 01:29 PM
Original message
CNBC talking about Morgan Stanley and other banks putting oil in tankers.

Did anyone else see them talking about that? It went like this.

Morgan Stanley is smart for stashing oil because they have bought options on it and it they hold it until it's higher they make money.

BUT. Isn't that manipulating the market? What about the investors who have bought options on oil betting it will go down? Are they supposed to lose because MS is keeping oil off the market?

Milton Friedman is having "distortion" fits in his grave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
   Replies to this thread
   There were people contending that this was happening when oil prices were  groovedaddy   Jan-16-09 01:36 PM   #1 
   Ooooh, thanks for reminding me about that rumor. I had forgotten.  Joanne98   Jan-16-09 01:41 PM   #2 
   This is the nonsense Enron tactics ....  Trajan   Jan-16-09 01:44 PM   #3 
   Here's a Reuters article.. Estimate is 80 million barrels  Joanne98   Jan-16-09 01:47 PM   #4 
   80 million barrels  marketcrazy1   Jan-16-09 01:52 PM   #5 
   They don't know for sure it could be more.  Joanne98   Jan-16-09 03:10 PM   #10 
      So, like two days' supply?  GliderGuider   Jan-16-09 03:14 PM   #11 
   Speculation? or do they know something?  screembloodymurder   Jan-16-09 10:53 PM   #12 
   The danger is that so many tankers will be tied up...  DCKit   Jan-16-09 01:57 PM   #6 
   the price of oil  marketcrazy1   Jan-16-09 02:03 PM   #7 
      Until they fill them all up with oil and park them offshore...  DCKit   Jan-16-09 02:37 PM   #8 
         now THATS funny!!! ( referring to me as an appolgist for the speculators )  marketcrazy1   Jan-16-09 02:42 PM   #9 
            I didn't take your post that way. Your post was truthful. n/t  utopiansecretagent   Jan-18-09 07:45 AM   #14 
   Yes, not on CNBC but that rumor has been around. Thanks for reporting it. NT  Mike 03   Jan-17-09 07:01 PM   #13 
   You're welcome Mike  Joanne98   Jan-18-09 10:28 AM   #16 
   See how many times the word speculator  callchet   Jan-18-09 08:40 AM   #15 
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Jan-16-09 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. There were people contending that this was happening when oil prices were
spiking. Reports of loaded tankers just sitting, while we were being told of shortages. Not sure if the banks had much to do with it. Enron did same thing with electricity in California getting a power plant to shut down for awhile to create a shortage, justifying a price hike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Jan-16-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ooooh, thanks for reminding me about that rumor. I had forgotten.
Another scandal on the way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Jan-16-09 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is the nonsense Enron tactics ....
It should be outlawed ....

Motherfuckers ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Jan-16-09 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Here's a Reuters article.. Estimate is 80 million barrels

LONDON, Jan 16 (Reuters) - Norway's Frontline (FRO.OL: Quote, Profile, Research), one of the world's biggest oil tanker owners, said on Friday oil firms were storing "about" 80 million barrels of crude oil at sea, possibly the highest in a quarter of a century.

The figure is the highest storage estimate reported to date. Ship broking houses, banks that trade oil and other industry sources believe the total is considerably lower.

"We think it's about 80 million barrels...but we are not 100 percent certain," the acting chief executive officer Martin Jensen told Reuters by telephone from Singapore.

Crude freight rates have been supported on top export routes by the slew of storage bookings. Tanker firms' profits are tied to the underlying cost of oil freight.

Mike Wittner of Societe Generale said the Frontline figure fitted the broader oil market picture.

http://in.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idINLG380177200901...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marketcrazy1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Jan-16-09 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. 80 million barrels
is a ONE DAY supply ( worldwide demand is about 82 million barrels a day )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Jan-16-09 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. They don't know for sure it could be more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Fri Jan-16-09 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. So, like two days' supply?
I'm sorry, the volume scales of tanker storage and daily global oil consumption aren't nearly close enough to make this a realistic market manipulation tactic. What happens if the market goes back to backwardation while the oil is in storage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Jan-16-09 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Speculation? or do they know something?
I think we're heading towards WWIII.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Jan-16-09 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. The danger is that so many tankers will be tied up...
the flow of oil will slow to a trickle. It's what they did to drive the price up above $140/bbl.

Oh, wait, that was all due to peak oil and greater demand in China and India. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marketcrazy1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Jan-16-09 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. the price of oil
is down because demand is low, there is plenty of tanker capacity to keep oil moving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Jan-16-09 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Until they fill them all up with oil and park them offshore...
as they did last summer.

If you're going to be an apologist for the speculators, please refrain from addressing my comments. You'd only be wasting both our time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marketcrazy1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Jan-16-09 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. now THATS funny!!! ( referring to me as an appolgist for the speculators )
Edited on Fri Jan-16-09 02:44 PM by marketcrazy1
but, as you wish!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlowDownFast (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sun Jan-18-09 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. I didn't take your post that way. Your post was truthful. n/t
Edited on Sun Jan-18-09 07:46 AM by utopiansecretagent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike 03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan-17-09 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yes, not on CNBC but that rumor has been around. Thanks for reporting it. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sun Jan-18-09 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. You're welcome Mike
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
.... callchet .... (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sun Jan-18-09 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
15. See how many times the word speculator
has come up in this thread. That seems to be the whole problem. Artificially influencing the market. What did the New Deal do about this ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Feb 10th 2010, 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC