Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

from MoveOn-a $5 billion trade fix includes $80B of unnecessary Taxcuts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 12:41 PM
Original message
from MoveOn-a $5 billion trade fix includes $80B of unnecessary Taxcuts

This bill makes a bad situation even worse. During the first three years of the George W. Bush administration, 82 of America's biggest and most profitable companies were able to use elaborate tax shelters to avoid paying ANY income taxes for at least a year.<1> One recent estimate said that these tax shelters are costing U.S. taxpayers $10 to $20 billion annually. <2>

The most profitable companies in the world, like General Electric, grease the wheels with intense lobbying to get these tax breaks. GE didn't pay any income tax in 2001, and got $9.5 billion in tax breaks between 2001 and 2003.<3> GE lobbyists had two provisions inserted into this bill which will save them hundreds of millions of dollars in taxes over the next few years. Last year, GE spent $7.5 million to lobby congress, and was one of the 10 biggest corporate contributors to members of Congress. <4>

Right now, our laws actually encourage this kind of behavior from corporate America. There was a chance to fix this problem -- and the bill actually does close a few of these loopholes. Unfortunately, it leaves others open, adds in a few new ones, and throws in billions in extra pork barrel projects for good measure.

The Republican members of Congress who wrote the final bill are showing that they value corporate profits more than people:

* They blocked attempts to close the biggest corporate tax
shelters, costing the rest of us billions.

* They rejected an effort to stop the Bush administration from
taking away overtime pay from 8 million American working families.

* They're spending $10 billion to buy out tobacco farmers, but
rejected a bi-partisan deal that would have finally allowed
the FDA to regulate cigarettes.

Tax policy isn't that exciting -- and the special interests want to keep it that way. While the rest of us have been focusing on other important issues, like the mess in Iraq and the presidential election, there's been a feeding frenzy around the Capitol.

"With hundreds of business lobbyists circling the House-Senate negotiations this week, lawmakers inserted so many subtle last-minute changes in wording that it will take weeks if not months for even the most skilled tax experts to identify all the deals that took place," says the New York Times. <5>

P.S.: Newspaper editorial boards don't like this bill either:

Minneapolis Star Tribune:
http://www.startribune.com/stories/561/5019818.html

Washington Post:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A13434-2004Oct6.html

Boston Globe: http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/editorials/articles/2004/10/07/tax_code_conflicts/

Footnotes:

<1> Citizens for Tax Justice: http://www.ctj.org/corpfed04pr.pdf

<2> Martin Sullivan,"Profit Shift Out of U.S. Grows, Costing Treasury $10 Billion or More," Tax Notes magazine, September 28, 2004.

<3> Citizens for Tax Justice: http://www.ctj.org/corpfed04pr.pdf

<4> See this Washington Post article for a revealing look at GE's lobbying on this bill:
"GE Lobbyists Mold Tax Bill", 7/13/04
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45064-2004Jul12.html

<5> NY Times, "Negotiators Approve Big Tax Cuts for Business", 10/7/04 (registration required)
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/07/business/07corptax.html?oref=login
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did they mention the refund checks to corporations
that gave back every cent of $$ that they paid in the Alternative Minimum Taxes since 1987?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. What is the Bill number and title?
is it H.R. 4520?

this just drives me nuts...
no newspaper, nobody publishes the real bill number and title,ever.

How the hell are people supposed to look it up in Thomas and
write their representatives if you can't find the friggin thing!

To start a grassroots action item of writing/faxing the house, you must
have this information!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. S. 1637 and H.R. 4520 are in Conference
In May, the Senate passed S. 1637, the “Jumpstart Our Business Strength Act,” repealing the FSC/ETI provisions that were ruled illegal by the World Trade Organization. In June, the House passed its version of the bill, H.R. 4520: “The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. right but the new disaster is H.R. 4520 correct?
In other words these amendments and new "special interests"
are in a modified version of this up right now in the house...

So, we need to DU our reps to defeat this bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. if GE took those tax cuts and created jobs instead
think of how many TENS OF THOUSANDS of people they could have hired. Probably went to the guys at the top making 100 mill a year anyway. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC