Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Going It Alone, Accolades...to Knight Ridder

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 09:13 PM
Original message
Going It Alone, Accolades...to Knight Ridder
When the New York Times apologized to readers May 26 for not being "more aggressive" in examining the administration's decision to invade Iraq, editors couldn't help but give a nod to a less-vaunted news organization that had been beating the Times on the story for some time: Knight Ridder's Washington bureau.

The contrast in coverage was stark at times. On September 8, 2002, the Times proclaimed in a front-page headline, "U.S. Says Hussein Intensified Quest for A-Bomb Parts." Knight Ridder had two days earlier proclaimed, "Lack of hard evidence of Iraqi weapons worries top U.S. officials." Knight Ridder continued with headlines like "Troubling questions over justification for war in Iraq" and "Failure to find weapons in Iraq leads to intelligence scrutiny," even as most other major media outlets sang a tune more in line with the Bush administration.


It wasn't until February that Michael Massing bestowed some of the first accolades on Knight Ridder, writing in The New York Review of Books: "Almost alone among national news organizations, Knight Ridder had decided to take a hard look at the administration's justifications for war."
more............

http://www.ajr.org/article_printable.asp?id=3725
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robert Murphy Donating Member (305 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Too Bad What They Reported Will Likely Go Down the Memory Hole...
An admirable performance by Knight-Ridder indeed. (Note that they received some 'unfriendly' phone calls from Administration officials for said coverage, on several occasions.)

What has astonished me--and I had previously thought the U.S. media could get no worse--is that all of pre-war skepticism about W. Admin. claims of Iraqi WMDs seems ENTIRELY forgotten. I clearly remember reading (having long since given up on the TV news media) a score of articles regarding the the mulititude of significant qualifications and reservations attached to U.S. intelligence reports on Iraqi WMDs, which the Bush Administration was willfully ignoring in its selling of the war. Granted, one had to read the back pages of the Washington Post or (much more rarely--thanks Judy Miller!) the NY Times to find such stories, but they were there. (Even the AP syndicated a few articles voicing these uncertainties.) Add to this the fact that NO OTHER country, save the UK--who was doing some serious fudging of their own--was backing up the Administrations claims. (Ditto for the U.N. inspectors on the ground in Iraq, whose efforts were deliberately hampered by false intelligence fed to them by the U.S.)

But now--Oh no!! It was all the @%%^$%@# CIA's fault! The poor Bush Administration was innocently misled!!

I am not privy (surprise!!) to Top Secret information, nor do I claim to be any expert on foreign affairs. But in the lead-up to the war, the Administration's claims sounded like utter horse excrement to even to my layman's ear. Yet nowhere in the (at least the TV) news media have I seen a single report even suggesting that the Bushies might have, um, 'exaggerated' the threat posed by Iraq. The slimes are set to get away with lying us into a war--perhaps they have already...

Cheers,

Robert
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cprise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's nice
Although I doubt they will be around long as an independant voice.

To my recollection, it was BBC World Service, The Guardian, and to a limited extent Reuters that informed the anti-war set before the invasion. These are the ones I remember as making a difference.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. Here's a link to the Washington Bureau of Knight Ridder
The in-depth good stuff gets posted here-

http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Dec 22nd 2014, 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC